Promises & The Promised Land
by Oliver North (more by this author)
Posted 05/22/2009 ET


On May 14, Israelis celebrated their sixty-first Independence Day. Less than 96 hours later, Benjamin Netanyahu, Israel’s Prime Minister, arrived at the White House in an effort to ensure that the Jewish State will survive to commemorate another anniversary.

In 1948 when Israel was founded by survivors of the Holocaust, they pledged, “Never Again!” Then, the tiny Jewish state, about the size of New Jersey, had a population of less than 850,000, and was surrounded by hostile neighbors, intent on its destruction. Today, 7.2 million people call Israel their home and the country has the only functioning democratic government in the neighborhood. As it was in the beginning -- and is now -- powerful opponents in the region remain committed to annihilating what they describe as “the Zionist entity.” Unfortunately, the theocracy in Iran is bent on acquiring the means of achieving that goal -- a threat the Obama administration appears unwilling or unable to do anything but talk about.

This week’s Obama-Netanyahu “summit” at the White House had but two items on the agenda: The O-Team quest for an Israeli-Palestinian “two-state solution” for “Peace in the Middle East” and the Israelis’ plea for U.S. help in stopping Tehran’s race to acquire nuclear weapons. After a 90-minute, one-one-one meeting, the two leaders sat for an Oval Office “press availability” during which they tried their best to make it appear that the U.S. and Israel are of one mind on these issues. It was a good try, complete with jocular exchanges and smiles -- but it just isn’t so.

Washington remains wedded to the naïve hope that if Israel simply withdraws from all territory it captured during the 1967 “Six-Day War,” tranquility in the volatile Middle East will be assured. According to the O-Team, “a two-state solution in which Israelis and Palestinians are living side by side in peace and security” will somehow motivate the Iranian government to abandon its quest for a nuclear arsenal and oft stated aim of “wiping Israel off the map.”

Prime Minister Netanyahu apparently understood the role he was handed in this piece of political theater -- the “warm-up” act for next week’s White House séances with Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak and Palestinian Authority President Mahmaud Abbas. All of this is but preamble to the much-anticipated June 4 address from Cairo in which Mr. Obama is pledged to describe his “new approach to the Muslim world.” Thankfully, for our own good and that of Israel, Mr. Netanyahu didn’t stick entirely to the White House script.

The Israeli Prime Minister did agree to “start peace negotiations with the Palestinians immediately,” and called for broadening “the circle of peace to include others in the Arab world.” But he never deviated from his most serious concern: the paramount threat to the survival of Israel -- and peace of any kind -- a nuclear-armed Iran. He carefully avoided endorsing a “two-state solution,” did not agree to withdraw from the Golan Heights or accede to shuttering Israeli settlements on the West Bank and Jerusalem. Nor did Mr. Netanyahu embrace the idea that the Ayatollahs in Tehran will be dissuaded from acquiring nuclear arms -- and the means of delivering them – just because Palestinians and Israelis are somehow living in comity.

Unfortunately, the O-Team offers little evidence that they share Israeli anxieties about Iranian weapons of mass destruction or the imminent deployment of Russian S-300 surface-to-air missiles to protect nuclear sites in Persia. Mr. Obama did say, “Iran obtaining a nuclear weapon” would “be a threat to Israel and the United States” and that it would be “destabilizing” and “extraordinarily dangerous,” But he then insisted that “We are engaged in a process to reach out to Iran and persuade them that it is not in their interest to pursue a nuclear weapon and that they should change course.” In short – nothing is going to be done to stop the Iranian nuclear program until after the June 12 Iranian elections and Mr. Obama and Mr. Ahmadinejad have a chance to stroke palms, sip tea and chat.

In subsequent discussions at the Departments of State and Defense, Mr. Netanyahu was reminded that Washington can shut off the flow of financial aid and military hardware to Israel in an instant. It turns out this same message was also being delivered in Tel Aviv by CIA Director Leon Panetta. None of this is good news for Israel or the United States.

Asked by a reporter in the Oval Office if he was concerned that his “outstretched hand has been interpreted by extremists, especially Ahmadinejad [and others] as a sign of weakness,” Mr. Obama’s replied, “Well it’s not clear to me why my outstretched hand would be interpreted as weakness.”

Just hours later, the Iranian regime successfully launched a 1200-mile range Sajjil-2 ballistic missile. So much for clarity, weakness and the wisdom of offering an outstretched hand to genocidal despots.

Ellie