Appeals Court: Marine can’t sue Murtha
Create Post
Results 1 to 2 of 2
  1. #1

    Exclamation Appeals Court: Marine can’t sue Murtha

    Appeals Court: Marine can’t sue Murtha
    By Nedra Pickler - The Associated Press
    Posted : Tuesday Apr 14, 2009 17:56:13 EDT

    WASHINGTON — A federal appeals court ruled Tuesday that Rep. John Murtha cannot be sued for accusing Marines of murdering Iraqi civilians “in cold blood,” remarks that sparked outrage among conservative commentators.

    The appeals court in Washington dismissed a defamation lawsuit brought by a Marine who led the squad in the attack. The judges agreed with Murtha that he was immune from the lawsuit because he was acting in his official role as a lawmaker when he made the comments to reporters.

    Staff Sgt. Frank Wuterich of Meriden, Conn., said Murtha damaged his reputation by saying the squad he was leading engaged in “cold-blooded murder and war crimes” in Hadithah, Iraq, on Nov. 19, 2005.

    At a Capitol Hill news conference in May 2006, Murtha predicted that a Pentagon war crimes investigation would show the Marines killed dozens of innocent Iraqi civilians in Hadithah.

    Military prosecutors have said two dozen Iraqis, including women and children, were killed in Hadithah after one Marine died and two others were wounded by a roadside bomb. Wuterich is charged with voluntary manslaughter and other allegations, the only person still facing charges in the attack.

    He has pleaded not guilty. He is accused of ordering his men to clear several houses with grenades and gunfire, leading to the civilian deaths.

    Republicans and conservatives accused Murtha, a decorated Vietnam veteran and retired Marine Reserve colonel, of convicting the Marines before the investigation was concluded and fueling enemy attacks in retaliation. GOP challengers tried to use the comments against Murtha in the 2006 and 2008 campaigns, but his constituents overwhelmingly re-elected the congressman who has represented them since 1974.

    Murtha, who is opposed to the Iraq war, has said he made the comments to draw attention to the pressure put on troops in Iraq and efforts to cover up the incident. He did not mention Wuterich or any other Marines by name.

    A three-judge panel on U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit found that Murtha could not be sued under the 1988 Westfall Act, which gives federal employees immunity from lawsuits arising out of acts they undertake in the course of their official duties.

    U.S. District Judge Rosemary M. Collyer had refused to dismiss the suit last September and ordered Murtha to give a sworn deposition about his comments. The appeals court overturned that order and said the case must be dismissed.

    Wuterich’s attorney Mark S. Zaid said that despite the appeals court ruling, Murtha should apologize for his statements.

    “It is disappointing that the court has placed members of Congress on a special pedestal and granted them carte blanche immunity to defame anyone they choose as part of their official responsibilities without even allowing a victim to expose the actual facts that are known only to the perpetrator,” Zaid said.

    Murtha’s spokesman declined to comment.

    Another Marine involved in the Hadithah fighting, Justin Sharratt, has filed a slander lawsuit against Murtha in Johnstown, Pa. Although the judge in that case may consider Tuesday’s decision and give it weight, it is not binding on that court since it’s in a different appeals court circuit.

    A former lance corporal, Sharratt sued Murtha in September claiming the lawmaker’s remarks not only defamed him, but denied him due process and the right to a fair trial on the charges in military court. Sharratt was initially charged with three counts of premeditated murder, but was exonerated after a full investigation and the military equivalent of a preliminary hearing. Sharratt said it was proven he killed insurgents, not civilians.

    Sharratt’s attorney, Noah Geary, argued that a jury in Pennsylvania should decide whether Murtha was acting within the scope of his official duties when he called the Marines murderers on cable TV news shows.

    “When he’s on the House floor he can say anything he wants,” Geary said. “But when he goes on Wolf Blitzer and Hannity and Colmes, and all these other outlets, he’s outside the scope of his employment when he’s making these comments,” Geary said.

    Ellie


  2. #2
    Last modified Tuesday, April 14, 2009 7:43 PM PDT




    MILITARY: Wuterich suit against Murtha tossed

    By ASSOCIATED PRESS and STAFF REPORTS

    A federal appeals court ruled Tuesday that Camp Pendleton's Staff Sgt. Frank Wuterich cannot sue Pennsylvania Rep. John Murtha for defamation after the congressman accused his squad of war crimes and murdering Iraqi women and children.

    Wuterich claimed Murtha damaged his reputation by saying the squad he was leading killed women and children "in cold blood" in Haditha, Iraq, on Nov. 19, 2005.

    Wuterich's attorney Mark Zaid said the ruling gives members of Congress "carte blanche immunity to defame anyone they choose as part of their official responsibilities."

    "Congressman Murtha, in particular, should be ashamed of himself," Zaid said Wednesday in a written statement to the North County Times. "Notwithstanding this legal reversal, we call upon him to apologize for his comments concerning Staff Sgt. Wuterich as even the government agrees they were not true."

    Murtha's spokesman declined to comment on the ruling.

    Two dozen Iraqis, including women and children, were killed as Wuterich's squad hunted for their attackers after one Marine was killed and two others wounded by a roadside bomb.

    Wuterich is accused of ordering his men to clear several houses with grenades and gunfire, leading to the deaths of women and children.

    The Connecticut native is charged with nine counts of voluntary manslaughter and other allegations for the attack. He has pleaded not guilty and is scheduled to go on trial by military court-martial at Camp Pendleton later this year.

    Four enlisted Marines were charged for their roles in the killings and four officers were charged in connection with the investigation. One officer was acquitted and charges have since been dropped against everyone else except Wuterich and Lt. Col. Jeffrey Chessani.

    Chessani is waiting to see if the Marine Corps will appeal a ruling from a military appeals court dismissing two counts of dereliction of duty against him.

    Murtha and the Justice Department argued the congressman has immunity from the lawsuit because he was acting in his official role as a lawmaker when he made the comments to reporters. A three-judge panel on U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia agreed.

    At a news conference in May 2006, Murtha predicted that a war crimes investigation would show the Marines killed dozens of innocent Iraqi civilians in Haditha. He did not mention Wuterich or anyone else by name.

    Murtha has said he made the comments to draw attention to the pressure put on troops in Iraq and efforts to cover up the incident. Murtha is a decorated Vietnam War veteran and retired Marine Reserves colonel.

    Wuterich filed the lawsuit in 2006, saying Murtha had inaccurate information about the incident

    U.S. District Judge Rosemary M. Collyer refused to dismiss the suit last September and ordered Murtha to give a sworn deposition about his comments. The appeals court overturned that order and said the case must be dismissed.

    Ellie


Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not Create Posts
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts