PDA

View Full Version : Obama may not ask allies for more combat troops in Afghanistan



thedrifter
01-29-09, 08:07 AM
Obama may not ask allies for more combat troops in Afghanistan
By Jonathan S. Landay and Nancy A. Youssef, McClatchy Newspapers
Wed Jan 28, 8:25 pm ET

WASHINGTON — With U.S. allies likely to rebuff requests to send more combat troops to Afghanistan , many Pentagon officials want President Barack Obama to shift U.S. policy and seek NATO help only in other areas such as police training and support for democratization, defense officials said.

Obama called for more NATO combat troops while he was campaigning for the presidency. But the officials said that NATO allies are unlikely to defy the majorities of their citizens who are opposed to deeper involvement in the war, and he'd squander political capital on an almost certainly futile bid to convince them otherwise.

"The problem is that all politics is local. No constituents in those countries want to be there anymore," a U.S. defense official told McClatchy , speaking on the condition of anonymity because he wasn't authorized to comment publicly.

Afghanistan was a major topic Wednesday of Obama's first meeting in the Pentagon with the Joint Chiefs of Staff.

"We're going to have some difficult decisions that we're going to have to make" on Afghanistan , Obama said later.

The president has pledged to refocus the fight against terrorism from Iraq to Afghanistan and endorsed a request by senior U.S. commanders to increase the 30,000-strong U.S. contingent by another 30,000 troops. Most would be sent to southern Afghanistan .

Many U.S. military officials have become disillusioned with the growing reluctance of NATO allies to allow their forces to engage in major combat operations in the Taliban strongholds of southern and eastern Afghanistan .

Some American officers contemptuously refer to the 30,000-strong NATO -led International Security Assistance Force, or ISAF, as "I Suck At Fighting" or "I Saw Americans Fight."

ISAF comprises some 30,000 troops from the 26 NATO members and 15 other countries. The 19,000-strong U.S. contingent is by far the largest. A separate 17,000-strong U.S. force concentrates on counter-terrorism operations.

During his campaign, Obama made a drive for more NATO troops a key plank of his plan for ending the war in Afghanistan , which last year saw its worst violence since the 2001 U.S. invasion.

"We haven't given up yet (on seeking more allied combat forces), but there is a certain realization that there is only so much water you can squeeze from that stone," said a second U.S. defense official, who asked not to be further identified to avoid speaking ahead of the new administration.

The U.S. defense officials said there are critical roles that ISAF should continue playing, such as providing security in northern and western areas where the Taliban have little support, training Afghan security forces and promoting reconstruction

"We recognize the limitations of what they can provide and need to make the maximum within those parameters," said a senior U.S. military officer, who requested anonymity because he wasn't authorized to speak publicly.

Obama is awaiting recommendations for a new Afghanistan strategy from the Joint Chiefs of Staff and the U.S. Central Command, which oversees U.S. military operations in Afghanistan .

The administration must decide whether to forgo requests for more NATO combat forces as part of its new strategy by the 26-nation alliance's annual summit, which is to be co-hosted by Germany and France in April.

Gates provided a clue to the administration's thinking at a hearing Tuesday before the Senate Armed Services Committee , when he was asked what more NATO could do to help contain the al Qaida -backed Taliban insurgency and stabilize Afghanistan .

He made no mention of seeking additional allied combat forces. Instead, he said the administration would like nations contributing to ISAF to lift restrictions, known as caveats, on the use of their forces and to provide additional equipment.

Vice President Joe Biden and National Security Adviser James Jones, a former NATO commander, however, could lay out the administration's ideas at an annual European security conference in Munich, Germany , in February.

The allies should also send more trainers and funds to build the Afghan police and the Afghan National Army , he said.

"I think that there are three areas where our allies need to do more. I think that there is a need for them to provide more caveat-free forces. I think that there is a need for them to provide more civilian support in terms of training and civil society," Gates said.

Last year, Gates pleaded for more ISAF troops at the annual NATO summit, but came away with only a single French battalion.

Robert Hunter , a former U.S. ambassador to the alliance, said he's advising administration officials against seeking more NATO troops because of the potential for "early difficulties within NATO ."

Instead, he said, European governments should be asked to redouble their commitments to fighting illegal narcotics trafficking, training the Afghan police, building the country's legal system, and boosting good governance under a 2006 accord known as the Afghanistan Compact.

A prominent senior European official should be named to coordinate their efforts, said Hunter, a senior adviser at the RAND Corp. , a policy research organization.

Ellie

thedrifter
01-29-09, 08:08 AM
At Pentagon, Obama Expresses Gratitude, Listens to Concerns

By Karen DeYoung
Washington Post Staff Writer
Wednesday, January 28, 2009; 11:22 PM


President Obama made another pilgrimage to a key policy outpost yesterday, crossing the Potomac River for the first time since his inauguration to visit the Pentagon, where he met the Joint Chiefs of Staff on their own turf.

The meeting in the secure conference room known as the "Tank" exceeded its allotted 90 minutes because "we kind of lost track of time," Obama said. "My first message was to say thank you," he told reporters after the session.

"And in addition," Obama continued, "it's to say that you -- all of you who are serving in the United States armed forces are going to have my full support. And one of my duties as president is going to be to make sure that you have what you need to accomplish your missions." He said there are "difficult decisions" ahead on Iraq and Afghanistan.

Obama said they had discussed his concern about the strains on military families and "making sure that the health of our force is always in our sights."

He said they talked about threats, "both short-term and long-term" and "some of the broader global risks that may arise" in addition to the Afghanistan and Iraq conflicts.

Going around the table, each service chief had a chance to address the president about his concerns. One Pentagon official described it as more of a "global strategic discussion" about all areas of the world, without a lengthy focus on Iraq and Afghanistan.

Officers at the meeting described their new commander in chief in glowing terms, saying he had seemed deeply interested in what they had to say, asked pertinent questions and was decisive in expressing his own views.

"This was by no means just another briefing for the Commander-in-Chief," Pentagon spokesman Geoff Morrell said in a statement e-mailed to reporters last night. Obama, he said, "was not simply in receive-mode. He, along with everyone else around the table, was fully engaged in a dynamic discussion about global risks, ways to mitigate them and how to do so in the midst of this economic crisis. I think everyone walked away with the sense that this new relationship got off to a very productive start."

Afterward, the new commander in chief turned to the several dozen officers and enlisted men from the various service branches waiting in the Joint Chief's corridor to shake his hand.

The meeting fulfilled a campaign pledge to sit down with the chiefs of the Army, Navy, Air Force, Marines and Chairman Adm. Michael Mullen to listen to their concerns and proposals on the Iraq and Afghanistan wars, the health and size of the armed forces, procurement and other issues. After a visit last week to the State Department and Tuesday's journey to Capitol Hill, the Pentagon trip was designed to symbolize openness and outreach.

As he did during his State Department visit, Obama, accompanied by Vice President Biden, indirectly criticized the administration of former president George W. Bush. "We have for a long time put enormous pressure on our military to carry out a whole set of missions, sometimes not with the sort of strategic support and the use of all aspects of American power, to make sure that they're not carrying the full load," he told reporters after the meeting.

"And that's something that I spoke with the chiefs about and that I intend to -- to change as president of the United States." Obama has pledged to increase the size of both the Army and the Marines, and to expand the work of U.S. diplomats and civilian officials overseas.

At a White House national security meeting on Iraq during his first day in office, Obama told Mullen, Secretary of Defense Robert M. Gates and military commanders that he wants to see their plans for the early combat withdrawal from Iraq he has promised. The military has long been planning for that option, along with others, and yesterday Obama was briefed on various withdrawal timetables.

Some military officials have expressed concerns about the risks of a rapid withdrawal, but most senior officers have said they see no problem in drawing down the troops in the absence of an unanticipated reversal of security gains in Iraq. Obama has indicated he plans to send as many as 30,000 more troops to Afghanistan this year, increasing the urgency of an Iraq drawdown.

Also yesterday, Obama's choice for director of national intelligence, retired Navy Adm. Dennis C. Blair, was approved by the Senate. Blair succeeds Mike McConnell as leader of the federal government's 16 intelligence agencies and Obama's senior intelligence adviser, supervising delivery of the president's daily intelligence briefing.

Ellie