Hammer, I'm not calling anyone names, posting profanity, or any of that. I will be perfectly honest with you: as far as the research I've seen, there is apparently such limited evidence of voter fraud, or the rates at which it might happen are so tiny, that I see no point behind these types of laws. And, if they wind up just making it harder for actual citizens to vote, then I think they are sinister and exist purely to disenfranchise people.

Now, in a thread that was devoted towards 'thinking' (the word think appears directly in the subject), someone should at least support their opinion that we need these laws rather than just get ****ed off at me. If there is evidence that this is a problem, and I've just not seen it, then perhaps I would change my mind on the matter. But I can guarantee none of the folks who are responding to me would change their mind on anything no matter how much evidence I provide that challenges their pre-existing views.