Fight over military sneakers could leave troops with fewer footwear choices

[Rocky C]

The ongoing political fight over what running shoes troops can buy spilled over into another legislative debate this week, providing yet one more setback for opponents of New Balance sneakers.

The result could mean a new Pentagon bureaucracy to purchase and distribute running shoes to military recruits, abolishing the practice of letting troops shop around for the sneakers they like best.

At issue is a provision included in the House and Senate versions of the annual defense authorization bill, both of which require the Defense Department to purchase only American-made footwear for service members.

As written, the language would force military officials to buy sneakers almost exclusively from New Balance, the athletics apparel company based in Massachusetts, which touts itself as “the only major company to make or assemble more than 4 million pairs of athletic footwear per year in the USA.”

And it would also do away with vouchers issued to troops to purchase their own training sneakers, replacing them with service-issued footwear.

Army, Navy and Air Force recruits receive a stipend to buy their own shoes, although the Navy restricts those purchases to certain sneaker types. The new legislative proposals call for military leaders to “furnish such footwear directly to the members instead of providing a cash allowance.”

That has raised concerns about how much sneaker inventory service planners would have to keep in stock, and whether the shoes troops get will fit them properly. The authorization bills’ provisions would allow for exceptions for medical needs, with those specifics to be worked out later.

Several lawmakers unsuccessfully objected to the new rules in their respective chamber debates on the authorization bill. With its inclusion in both the House and Senate drafts, the provision isn’t up for debate in conference negotiations, and it would become law if the measure is finalized later this year.


This week, Rep. Mark Sanford, R-S.C., pushed to undercut the new policy as part of the pending defense appropriations bill, offering an amendment which would strip all funding for the “American-made” shoes provision.

“(This new rule) would begin to limit choices,” he said during a floor speech Wednesday, “I think for the average recruit out there, there is wisdom to have new choices based on the (idea) one size never fits all. There have been military studies that show a correlation between injury and fewer choices.”

But Niki Tsongas, D-Mass., one of the main proponents of the sneaker change, said the issue is one of fairness, since defense officials promised to purchase American-made products once they became available.


“Today the domestic shoe industry has rebounded, employing thousands of workers throughout the country,” she said. “Several versions of a completely American-made shoe are now available to the Defense Department, but they have yet to provide those shoes to new recruits.”

Sanford's bid to remove the new sneaker rules failed by a 155-265 vote.

The White House and Defense Department oppose the measure, but appear to have little path to stop Congress’ decision other than a series of vetoes. President Barack Obama has threatened a veto over both the appropriations and authorization bills, but not on the sneaker provisions.

Details of how the sneakers will be bought and distributed still must be worked out by Pentagon officials, if the provision is included when the authorization bill becomes law. The measure is expected to be finalized sometime this fall.

Similar Threads:

• Marine's going green..fewer convoys = fewer ambushes = fewer casualties.
• Balad saves more Iraqis as fewer troops wounded
• 'Some very hard choices' on troops for Afghanistan
• Military sees fewer sex assault reports
• Gates sees a fall scenario for fewer troops

[Tennessee Top]

My niece was fitted with a pair of New Balance at Parris Island. She threw them in the $hitcan before leaving the island.

[advanced]

Back in the day we had no such problems as we all ran in our combat boots. Why, we were Marines after all. Of course our PFT was also done in full combat gear with steel pot, pack, rifle, etc. We weren't trying to be track stars, we were being trained to enter the fight. My times have changes.

Kinder, gentler = Weaker, less prepared

I fear for my Corps

[Hammer]

Back in the day we had no such problems as we all ran in our combat boots. Why, we were Marines after all. Of course our PFT was also done in full combat gear with steel pot, pack, rifle, etc. We weren't trying to be track stars, we were being trained to enter the fight. My times have changes.

Kinder, gentler = Weaker, less prepared

I fear for my Corps

Russ, You are correct! Good post; brought back some memories.

[oldtop]

advanced;1011782]Back in the day we had no such problems as we all ran in our combat boots. Why, we were Marines after all. Of course our PFT was also done in full combat gear with steel pot, pack, rifle, etc. We weren't trying to be track stars, we were being trained to enter the fight. My times have changes.

Kinder, gentler = Weaker, less prepared


brought back memories for sure... but then, we have NO enemies today....

as for the tennie runners, I truly believe that SOMEBODY has lost their mind... limiting the tennis shoes a service member can use to PT??? REALLY??? How about you people getting to work and try to solve the mess this country is in, and let the service member pick the tennis shoe that the INDIVIDUAL finds most comfortable...

I too, fear for my Corps

[marine6551]

good grief charlie brown, you're no longer a ivvie, in our boot camps, you shall wear the combat boots issued, otherwise, your pansy butt should've joined the navy.

[marine6551]

advanced;1011782]Back in the day we had no such problems as we all ran in our combat boots. Why, we were Marines after all. Of course our PFT was also done in full combat gear with steel pot, pack, rifle, etc. We weren't trying to be track stars, we were being trained to enter the fight. My times have changes.

Kinder, gentler = Weaker, less prepared


brought back memories for sure... but then, we have NO enemies today....

as for the tennie runners, I truly believe that SOMEBODY has lost their mind... limiting the tennis shoes a service member can use to PT??? REALLY??? How about you people getting to work and try to solve the mess this country is in, and let the service member pick the tennis shoe that the INDIVIDUAL finds most comfortable...

I too, fear for my Corps

well said brother, i was glad i had combat boots during basic training!