Disqualified for scarification on wrist - Page 4
Closed Thread
Page 4 of 6 FirstFirst 123456 LastLast
Results 46 to 60 of 83
  1. #46
    Administrator Platinum Member Rocky C's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Providence, RI
    Posts
    48,647
    Credits
    78,337
    Savings
    0
    LOOOOOOOOOONG Thread.

    Jason, time to lock this one up Brother.

    - .... . / ..-. . .-- --..-- / - .... . / .--. .-. --- ..- -.. --..-- / - .... . / -- .- .-. .. -. . ... .-.-.- .-.-.- .-.-.- .-.-.-



    All Marine, All The Time...

  2. #47
    Marine Free Member USNAviator's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Glen Allen, Virginia
    Posts
    3,186
    Credits
    8,023
    Savings
    0
    I didn't t realize there was another thread going in Ask a Marine

    Josh I'll give you credit you may be a disrespectful wise$ass but you sound sincere But as I pointed out to you earlier, the decision has been made. The Corps is downsizing by about 50K.They can be very selective in whom they allow to enlist. But as this post says and I wanted to give the postie credit

    afraziaaaa
    Marine
    Free Member

    Corps policy states that any tattoos, branding or body markings within two inches of the natural bend of the wrist are prohibited. Until that policy changes (and I don't see it changing) you are ineligible for service in the Marine Corps. That is the cold, hard truth."


    I sincerely hope you try another branch. You can do intel work in the Navy. I can send you some info re. Navy MOS if you want via a PM or you can visit a Navy recruiter.


  3. #48
    Quote Originally Posted by Old Marine View Post
    No disrespect to Chesty, but sometimes I wonder what he was drinking when he made a statement such as that. I personnaly do not see where a Marine Brig Rat is any more a Marine than one who is not a Brig Rat.

    Could be..he was trying to include Marines who were typically considered
    outcasts. These types, will sometimes, fight to the death for their unit or
    the mission. Not that the perfectly squared away Marine wouldn't fight to
    the death but..his life may mean more to him and his family than the brig rat who has nothing to lose.

    Thanks for the thoughts Gunny. This young man is not a Marine and could
    use an attitude adjustment.

    Hope he gets it.


  4. #49
    Quote Originally Posted by MarineInMaking View Post
    the job i had in mind was 0231 Intel specialist and get 0211 Counterintelligence and HUMINT within a few years

    the other job i was recommended was Cryptic linguist or something like that, i have less knowledge of that job but it was recommended and i plan on reading up on it.

    the reason i want intel is because i have a job waiting for me at home if i did. I chose the Corps. because it was the most challenging and offered the most for me. I chose military because i, again, thought it would benefit me better as a person.
    Corps does not have a period at the end unless you have it at the end of a sentence.

    And I agree Rocky...this has gone on way to loooooooooooong.


  5. #50
    The army will take a smartazz like that anytime, get fitted for your Christmas tree, Semper Fidelis.


  6. #51
    Marine Friend Free Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    High Ridge
    Posts
    35
    Credits
    41
    Savings
    0
    i don't see how i was being a smart ass, i was asking for information and was responding to posts accordingly. I apologize if i came across as disrespectful. I will admit my manners aren't exactly "high society"


  7. #52
    Marine Friend Free Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    High Ridge
    Posts
    35
    Credits
    41
    Savings
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by USNAviator View Post
    I didn't t realize there was another thread going in Ask a Marine

    Josh I'll give you credit you may be a disrespectful wise$ass but you sound sincere But as I pointed out to you earlier, the decision has been made. The Corps is downsizing by about 50K.They can be very selective in whom they allow to enlist. But as this post says and I wanted to give the postie credit

    afraziaaaa
    Marine
    Free Member

    Corps policy states that any tattoos, branding or body markings within two inches of the natural bend of the wrist are prohibited. Until that policy changes (and I don't see it changing) you are ineligible for service in the Marine Corps. That is the cold, hard truth."


    I sincerely hope you try another branch. You can do intel work in the Navy. I can send you some info re. Navy MOS if you want via a PM or you can visit a Navy recruiter.

    Thank you, and again I have never been one for manners, one of the many things i hope too learn while in service.

    "Marines aren't born, they are made" I don't remember where i heard that, but it stuck with me

    If marines won't take me, the navy will, they don't have a policy on tattoos (as far as i know).

    I would also like too formally apologize if i've offended anybody with my rudeness or "wise@ss" responses. I will be the first too admit that i DO need an attitude adjustment, the i thought the Corps would provide me with that service.

    That being said I'm still going too notify my Congressman of this situation I am in, and still plan on going Marines, no matter what i have too do. Navy is my plan B, but i'm going too make damn sure that plan A is completely out of the question before i even consider changing plans

    Again, I'm sorry if I've offended anyone or disrespected anyone.


  8. #53
    Marine Free Member USNAviator's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Glen Allen, Virginia
    Posts
    3,186
    Credits
    8,023
    Savings
    0
    "If marines won't take me, the navy will, they don't have a policy on tattoos (as far as i know)."

    Sorry Josh but yes they do



    WASHINGTON (NNS) -- Chief of Naval Personnel Vice Adm. John C. Harvey Jr. released a message March 21 clarifying the Navy’s regulations regarding tattoos, body art and/or mutilations and dental ornamentation.

    The message underscores Navy policy that already prohibits any body art deemed prejudicial to good order, discipline and morale or of a nature to bring discredit upon the naval service.

    “This is directly tied to the public appearance of our personnel," said Rear Adm. Gerry Talbot, director, Military Personnel Plans and Policy Division, Chief of Naval Personnel. "How we look in uniform, how we represent our Navy and our nation should be something we consider on a daily basis, on duty or off.”

    Navy policy stipulates that any tattoo/body art/brand that is obscene, sexually explicit or advocates discrimination of any sort is prohibited. Administrative separation could result for personnel disregarding this guidance.

    Four criteria have been issued to commanders to assist them in determining whether a tattoo, body art or brand should be permitted: content, location, size and whether the item is required for cosmetic purposes.

    “It is important to clarify our policy to ensure everyone understands the criteria,” said Talbot.

    Location is as important as the content of the tattoo. Tattoos/body art/brands cannot be visible through the white uniform and cannot be on the head, face, neck or scalp regions. Items on the lower arm can be no larger than the wearer’s hand, fingers closed.

    The message also points out Navy policy restricting intentional mutilation of any sort. This is defined as radical alteration of the body, head, face or skin for the purpose of an abnormal appearance.

    Dental ornamentation - the use of gold, platinum or other veneers or caps for decorative purposes is also prohibited.

    Waivers for pre-existing conditions will be considered on a case-by-case basis by local commanders. They have discretion to determine whether removal is required, but items may be waived if they are not prejudicial to good order, discipline and morale.


  9. #54
    Marine Friend Free Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    High Ridge
    Posts
    35
    Credits
    41
    Savings
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by USNAviator View Post
    "If marines won't take me, the navy will, they don't have a policy on tattoos (as far as i know)."

    Sorry Josh but yes they do



    WASHINGTON (NNS) -- Chief of Naval Personnel Vice Adm. John C. Harvey Jr. released a message March 21 clarifying the Navy’s regulations regarding tattoos, body art and/or mutilations and dental ornamentation.

    The message underscores Navy policy that already prohibits any body art deemed prejudicial to good order, discipline and morale or of a nature to bring discredit upon the naval service.

    “This is directly tied to the public appearance of our personnel," said Rear Adm. Gerry Talbot, director, Military Personnel Plans and Policy Division, Chief of Naval Personnel. "How we look in uniform, how we represent our Navy and our nation should be something we consider on a daily basis, on duty or off.”

    Navy policy stipulates that any tattoo/body art/brand that is obscene, sexually explicit or advocates discrimination of any sort is prohibited. Administrative separation could result for personnel disregarding this guidance.

    Four criteria have been issued to commanders to assist them in determining whether a tattoo, body art or brand should be permitted: content, location, size and whether the item is required for cosmetic purposes.

    “It is important to clarify our policy to ensure everyone understands the criteria,” said Talbot.

    Location is as important as the content of the tattoo. Tattoos/body art/brands cannot be visible through the white uniform and cannot be on the head, face, neck or scalp regions. Items on the lower arm can be no larger than the wearer’s hand, fingers closed.

    The message also points out Navy policy restricting intentional mutilation of any sort. This is defined as radical alteration of the body, head, face or skin for the purpose of an abnormal appearance.

    Dental ornamentation - the use of gold, platinum or other veneers or caps for decorative purposes is also prohibited.

    Waivers for pre-existing conditions will be considered on a case-by-case basis by local commanders. They have discretion to determine whether removal is required, but items may be waived if they are not prejudicial to good order, discipline and morale.

    I was not aware of this, thank you for the information.
    At least this will help my argument that it is barely visible “This is directly tied to the public appearance of our personnel,"
    and
    "How we look in uniform, how we represent our Navy and our nation should be something we consider on a daily basis, on duty or off.”

    what is keeping me from entry isn't visible too the naked eye unless closely examined, although it is larger than my fist, and it is past my natural fold on the top side. Well, it's still a long shot but whatever information i can use, is appreciated greatly.


  10. #55
    Marine Free Member USNAviator's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Glen Allen, Virginia
    Posts
    3,186
    Credits
    8,023
    Savings
    0
    Well I'm 23 minutes past Dog Watch. Time a cold one.

    Fair Winds Marines


  11. #56
    Quote Originally Posted by SGT7477 View Post
    The army will take a smartazz like that anytime, get fitted for your Christmas tree, Semper Fidelis.
    You can talk all the trash you want but if you ever make it To Our Famous Yellow Footprints it all changes,lol, Semper Fidelis.


  12. #57
    Marine Free Member USNAviator's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Glen Allen, Virginia
    Posts
    3,186
    Credits
    8,023
    Savings
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by MarineInMaking View Post
    I was not aware of this, thank you for the information.
    At least this will help my argument that it is barely visible “This is directly tied to the public appearance of our personnel,"
    and
    "How we look in uniform, how we represent our Navy and our nation should be something we consider on a daily basis, on duty or off.”

    what is keeping me from entry isn't visible too the naked eye unless closely examined, although it is larger than my fist, and it is past my natural fold on the top side. Well, it's still a long shot but whatever information i can use, is appreciated greatly.
    Josh you do realize this is Navy and not Marine policy don't you Big difference!!! It's not a Chinese restaurant, you can't take from column A and then from column B. All branches are different.


  13. #58
    I'll take a #5 on the lunch menu please.


  14. #59
    Marine Friend Free Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    High Ridge
    Posts
    35
    Credits
    41
    Savings
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by USNAviator View Post
    Josh you do realize this is Navy and not Marine policy don't you Big difference!!! It's not a Chinese restaurant, you can't take from column A and then from column B. All branches are different.

    I apologize, i did not communicate that clearly.
    I meant if they Navy had any issue with it. Sorry, I'm doing multiple things at once. I'm currently reading and re-reading the Marine's policy on this website http://usmilitary.about.com/od/marines/a/tattoo.htm


  15. #60
    Marine Friend Free Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    High Ridge
    Posts
    35
    Credits
    41
    Savings
    0
    "Half-sleeve or quarter sleeve tattoos that are visible to the eye when wearing standard PT Gear (T-shirt and shorts). A half-sleeve or quarter-sleeve tattoo is defined as a very large tattoo or collection of smaller tattoos that covers, or almost covers the entire portion of an army or leg above or below the elbow or knee."

    this one has caught my eye a number of times because of the statement "that are visible to the eye"

    is this taken directly from the Marine's rule books or is this paraphrased in any way. A suggestion too a site with the most reliable information would be greatly appreciated.

    "Marines who currently have a sleeve tattoo(s) prior to 1 April 2007, will be grandfathered. The Marine's command will insert a photograph(s) of the respective (tattoo(s) along with a measurement(s) of the size in inches and of the location(s) on the body and the date the tattoo(s) was documented, on the Page 11 of the Marine's SRB. The Marine will sign the Page 11 entry verifying the information is correct."

    this one as well. does it mean already enlisted marines? or those looking too enlist. I got mine on my 16th birthday (February 19th 2007)
    although i did not keep any documentation, but i have witnesses


Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not Create Posts
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts