Clinton's Postwar Critique
Clinton's Postwar Critique
By Howard Kurtz
Washington Post Staff Writer
Wednesday, April 16, 2003; 8:43 AM
Bill Clinton is back on the warpath.
You have to wonder about his timing.
Just days after the American victory in Baghdad, one might expect the 42nd president to let his successor have his moment.
After all, Clinton, despite some occasional potshots, supported Bush's tough stance against Saddam. It was Clinton who signed a 1998 law making regime change the official policy of the United States – even though he did little, other than dropping a few bombs, to bring it about.
Not that Clinton can't play the role of constructive critic. But the timing of his latest blast suggests that he just can't stand being off the stage for long.
Frankly, in light of the stunning military victory in Iraq, his comments sound a bit churlish – even though he makes some valid points. Shouldn't the former commander-in-chief be congratulating America's soldiers?
Maybe Clinton is just trying to boost interest in his "60 Minutes" debates with Bob Dole.
With Bush's every utterance – like yesterday's speech on taxes – carried live on cable, the Democratic candidates must be pondering whether Clinton is going to use up much of their remaining oxygen.
The war officially ended yesterday, by the way – not with any White House pronouncement but with the decision by the cable networks to dump out of a Donald Rumsfeld press conference to cover a California coroner talking about missing woman Laci Peterson. Iraq? That was so three days ago. Local crime rules once again.
Here's a Yahoo News report on Clinton's remarks:
"Former President Bill Clinton blasted U.S. foreign policy adopted in the wake of the September 11 attacks, arguing the United States cannot kill, jail or occupy all of its adversaries.
"'Our paradigm now seems to be: something terrible happened to us on September 11, and that gives us the right to interpret all future events in a way that everyone else in the world must agree with us,' said Clinton, who spoke at a seminar of governance organized by Conference Board.
"'And if they don't, they can go straight to hell.'
"The Democratic former president, who preceded George W. Bush at the White House, said that sooner or later the United States had to find a way to cooperate with the world at large.
"'We can't run,' Clinton pointed out. 'If you got an interdependent world, and you cannot kill, jail or occupy all your adversaries, sooner or later you have to make a deal.'
"He said he believed Washington overreacted to German and French opposition to U.S. plans for military action against Iraq and suggested that the current administration had trouble juggling foreign and domestic issues.
To read the full article......
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...2003Apr16.html
Sempers,
Roger