PDA

View Full Version : Obama Not Afraid To Veto Defense Bill



Rocky C
06-16-10, 03:01 PM
By Rick Maze - Staff writer
Posted : Wednesday Jun 16, 2010 15:05:52 EDT
<FORM id=hidden></FORM>
Defense Secretary Robert Gates said Wednesday that lawmakers should not underestimate the Obama administration’s resolve to eliminate wasteful spending, and he renewed a vow to recommend a veto of defense legislation if key programs are not dropped.

“Let me be very clear,” Gates said in testimony before the Senate defense appropriations subcommittee. “I will continue to strongly recommend that the president veto any legislation that sustains the continuations of the C-17 or the F-35 extra engine.”

Some lawmakers have expressed doubts that President Obama would veto the defense budget over these two issues, but Gates said it would be wrong to underestimate the administration’s resolve.

“Let me be explicit,” he said. “It would be a mistake to believe the president would accept these unneeded programs simply because the authorization or appropriations legislation includes provisions important to him and this administration.”

Gates is referring to a belief that Obama would not veto legislation that includes provisions that he strongly supports, such as the repeal of the military’s ban on allowing gays to serve openly.

Gates also said he is “increasingly concerned” that Congress has yet to pass a supplemental war funding bill to pay for ongoing operations. “If the supplemental is not enacted by the July 4th congressional recess, we will have to begin planning to curtail defense operations,” he said, in a carefully worded threat that speaks of preparing for cuts but not necessarily making them.

If Congress doesn’t pass the war funding bill by early July, “we begin to have to do stupid things,” Gates said.

Gates said the Navy and Marine Corps will have budget problems first, running out of operating funds in July.

The Army will dip into peacetime operating funds so it can continue with supplemental war funding until August, Gates said. At that point, it also will run out of base budget money and could be forced to furlough civilian employees and “have people on active duty we cannot pay.”

While that sounds like service members would miss checks, that is not what really happens. Even if the military runs out of money, essential national security programs — including paying the troops — is allowed under what is known as the Feed and Forage Act.

USMCM38A1
06-16-10, 03:57 PM
Cut spending in the middle of a War what a great idea but lets give some illegal immigrants or some otherr undeserving thing like the study of snails some money and while we are at it lets let BP off the hook also.

Kegler300
06-16-10, 04:07 PM
Executive leadership at it's finest...except he's never been an executive, and he's never been a leader.

usmc3521
06-16-10, 04:25 PM
how much money would we save it we quit wasting our time in iraq and afghan??? TRILLIONS

KFH
06-17-10, 03:37 PM
Cut spending in the middle of a War what a great idea but lets give some illegal immigrants or some otherr undeserving thing like the study of snails some money and while we are at it lets let BP off the hook also.

Let's take a more in-depth look at this post, shall we?

Remarks about cutting spending

If by cutting funding you mean not paying an additional $485 million for an engine SecDef has determined to be a waste of money (http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/05/27/AR2010052705614.html), then yes, he'll "cut spending in the middle of a War". The items in contention are all expenditures that the Department of Defense have determined are unnecessary and wasteful, but Congress keeps giving them and their contractors anyway. (http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/05/16/AR2010051602937.html)

The Federal government is looking to move away from the disastrous and unsustainable economic policies put in place by Regan and Bush II, like cutting taxes for the wealthy and increasing spending on military equipment. Getting rid of worthless expenditures like a jet engine that isn't necessary is one of those.

Remarks about fundign for illegal immigrants and "studying snails"

Uh, where exactly did this come from? At what point has the Obama administration made any policy or funding decisions concerning Immigration and Customs Enforcement? What drastic changes to citizenship have come about since he was inagurated?

As far as research funding, are you aware just how many different inventions and patents have come from NASA (gov't funded, mind you) research alone? And how much money those have generated over the years?

Or do you follow Bobby "Volcano Monitoring" Jindal's dim view of funding research that could potentially save American lives, American money, and American infastructure?

Remarks about letting BP off the hook:

I would be more concerned about Republican efforts to let BP off the hook (http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2010/6/17/876879/-Hayward-hearing:-Republican-apologizes-to-BP-CEO?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed:+dailykos/index+(Daily+Kos)) more than anything from the current administration. If your primary source of news is Fox, however, you might have missed it, since they snipped it from their coverage entirely while MSNBC and CNN caught it.

In conclusion: There's more to this issue than just "LOL OBAMBI IS KUTTIN MAH BUDGITZ FER SOSHULIZM!!11!!!1". Reducing it to just that only makes you look ignorant of the larger issues at hand.

Oh, and punctuation is your friend.