PDA

View Full Version : US to send troops to Liberia?



wrbones
06-30-03, 04:29 AM
The Electronic Telegraph ^ | 30/06/2003) | Adrian Blomfield





The United States appears to be on the brink of sending troops to end the brutal civil war in Liberia.

Officials in Washington met round the clock over the weekend to plan a possible armed response - its first mission to Africa since the disastrous intervention in Somalia almost a decade ago.

A statement is expected within the next few days, possibly as early as this evening.

President George W Bush has come under pressure from Britain and France to lead an emergency combat force to the Liberian capital, Monrovia, where at least 700 people were killed when rebels attacked a fortnight ago.

It is understood that the State Department and Pentagon are keen for action but have met opposition from the White House. Mr Bush has called on Liberian President Charles Taylor, indicted for war crimes by a United Nations court earlier this month, to step down.

Mr Taylor has welcomed a United States-led intervention, not just to end 14 years of near-constant civil war in his country, but perhaps believing it could allow him to cling to power.

"I think the US ought to come now, using my strength, my popularity and my legitimacy and work to bring peace in Liberia," Mr Taylor said.

The rebels, who called a ceasefire on Friday, say the president must step down within 30 days to pave the way for a transitional government. Mr Taylor has refused to surrender power until his term expires in January.

Kofi Annan, the UN Secretary-General, has asked the UN Security Council to approve a military mission to enforce the truce. A delegation from the council flew into nearby Ghana yesterday.

While the details of exactly what role the Americans would play in such a force remain unclear, Washington's choice appears to stark: command the mission, or do not get involved at all.

Britain, which recently led a similar mission in Sierra Leone on Liberia's northern border, and France, intervening in Ivory Coast's civil war to the south, clearly believe it is America's turn to become involved in West Africa.

Both countries have signalled they may be willing to provide military or logistic aid.

Peace in Liberia is crucial for much of West Africa. Civil wars in Ivory Coast, Sierra Leone and instability in Guinea are all offshoots of the Liberian conflict fuelled by Mr Taylor's wider ambitions.

As he grapples with Africa, a continent he will visit for the first time next month and which he has virtually ignored since coming to power, President Bush will be keenly aware of President Bill Clinton's doomed efforts in Somalia in 1994.

wrbones
06-30-03, 04:30 AM
Reuters
U.S. still very wary of role in Liberia-diplomats




--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


By David Clarke

MONROVIA, June 30 (Reuters) - The United States faced more demands on Monday to intervene in Liberia's bloody crisis, but Western diplomats said President George W. Bush's administration was far from convinced.

West African countries pledged troops for a force on Sunday as they joined appeals from U.N. Secretary-General Kofi Annan, Britain and France for a leading U.S. role to help stop bloody fighting for the capital and end nearly 14 years of violence.

The killing of 700 people in two failed rebel attacks on Monrovia this month has raised fears of an even bigger bloodbath if the rebels or President Charles Taylor, a former warlord wanted by a war crimes court, renege on truces again.

There is particular pressure on the United States because of historic ties to a country founded by freed American slaves more than 150 years ago -- even its Lone Star flag is modelled on the Stars and Stripes.

The Economic Community of West African States bloc told a U.N. Security Council mission to the region on Sunday their countries could send troops, but they wanted help from the West and ideally the United States.

Western diplomats said regional giant Nigeria would be able to send at least 3,000 troops, which should be enough to protect Monrovia against the hordes of drugged-up fighters.

But the diplomats said that the battle for soldiers, logistic support, or at least financial help, was far from won in Washington. Even though some State Department officials appeared in favour, the Pentagon was still generally uneasy.

Bush has simply told Taylor he should step down to save his three million people further suffering.

"The American position has been that there should be no help for a force unless there is a political agreement among Liberians," one of the diplomats said. "That looks difficult." Bush is likely to hear more about the conflict when he visits Nigeria next week as part of a five-nation tour of Africa, his first trip to the continent.

PEACE TALKS IN LIMBO

Peace talks in Ghana were adjourned last Friday because of fighting in spite of a ceasefire signed by both sides.

The rebels control about 60 percent of Liberia in their war to oust Taylor, a former warlord accused of fanning regional conflict and wanted by an international court for war crimes in Sierra Leone.

Taylor emerged as the dominant faction leader in a war that left 200,000 dead in the 1990s and went on to win 1997 elections. He has offered to step down for a transition government when his term ends in January.

But the rebels want him to go sooner and British U.N. ambassador Jeremy Greenstock said on Sunday that the Security Council wanted a transition government to be set up as soon as possible without any of the factions.

Liberia's long-suffering people have little faith in their leaders and there is a growing clamour for anyone from outside to protect the once relatively prosperous country from the generation of gunmen bred by its strife.

"We're all dying," said Emily Baker, who lost her husband in the war. "All these people who want to rule us: Who are they going to rule? The trees?"

Regional analysts say that Washington appears uneasy because of lack of a clear strategic interest and memories of a humiliating withdrawal from a humanitarian mission to Somalia in 1993 that left 18 Americans dead.

"The sad thing is, Liberia is probably the country that loves America more than anywhere else," said Alex Vines, head of the Africa programme at London's Royal Institute of International Affairs.

(Additional reporting by Anne Boher in Accra, Matthew Tostevin in Abidjan)

wrbones
06-30-03, 04:35 AM
http://www.cia.gov/cia/publications/factbook/geos/li.html

firstsgtmike
06-30-03, 04:48 AM
I think that ALL countries asking us to put American lives on the line should be asked how they voted when the US was asking for support against Saddam Hussain.

That comment applies not ony to Liberia but also to any other hotspots in the world in the next 20 years.

CPLRapoza
06-30-03, 05:24 AM
The fact that France is asking us for support is totally mind-boggling. They're a bunch of backstabbing f***s anyway.

Art Petersn
06-30-03, 06:03 AM
I don't think we should be policeing the whole world.

Lock-n-Load
06-30-03, 06:48 AM
:marine: No American armed forces to Africa...let the Frogs continue to sack those poor unfortunate tribes, as for Mr. Taylor welcoming armed might of the USA...I hope President GW Bush tells him to go to take a big fat dump...as for that wimp in an executive suit [Kofi Annan]...how come "olde buddy" Koffi, blasted USA for going into Iraq shooting up all Ragheads; now that dusky diplomat wants USA to shoot up his countrymen..hey, Koffi go take a hike off a cliff, you hypocrite...Africa is the biggest cesspool on the planet...deadly virus' up the ying-yang and masses of people who are ..Expendable...NO, let any and all others go into Africa and carve up the place...USA stays at home...and to all those other devious African/dilettantes in the United Nations...you scumbags!!...clean up your joint yourselves...where the hell were you slobs when we took on the Ragheads in Kuwait and Iraq....Semper Fi, Mac!!!:marine: