PDA

View Full Version : Top US general visits soldiers in Iraq, sees the strain



thedrifter
07-17-07, 06:18 AM
Top US general visits soldiers in Iraq, sees the strain

By Robert Burns, Associated Press | July 17, 2007

BAGHDAD -- On his first visit to Iraq since the United States accelerated combat operations, Marine General Peter Pace is seeing the strain on American troops.

Men and women in uniform have been doing multiple tours of duty, and soldiers are serving longer after the Army's decision in January to extend deployments by three months -- to 15.

"That has impact on families," the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff said in an Associated Press interview yesterday.

The nation's top general made clear he believes the soldiers and Marines in Iraq are focused on their mission. He seemed more concerned that families would lose patience with the long separations and the constant worry about loved ones being killed or wounded.

Multiple combat tours for many in the Army and Marine Corps could tear at the fabric of the military, he said, and that is one reason he is visiting troops now -- to hear their concerns, assess their morale and explain why he advocated longer tours. He also plans to stop in Germany this week to meet with family members of military units that are affected by tour extensions.

Pace said that in weighing possible new directions in Iraq, the Bush administration must consider not only what works best on the battlefield but also the growing stress of more than four years of war on troops and their families.

He said that he and the chiefs of the Army, Marine Corps, Navy, and Air Force are developing their own assessment of the situation in Iraq, to be presented to President Bush in September -- separately from the highly anticipated report to Congress that month by General David Petraeus, the top US commander for Iraq.

The Joint Chiefs are considering a range of actions, including a larger troop buildup, Pace said. He called it prudent planning to enable the services to be ready for any possibility.

The military must "be prepared for whatever it's going to look like two months from now," Pace said in a separate interview with two reporters traveling with him to Iraq from Washington.

"That way, if we need to plus up or come down" in numbers of troops in Iraq, the details will have been studied, he said.

Pace, on his first visit since US commanders accelerated combat operations in June, said another option is maintaining current troop levels beyond September.

There are now about 158,000 US troops in Iraq, after a boost of about 30,000 to carry out the new strategy Bush announced in January. The plan is focused on providing better security for Iraqis in Baghdad, but the intended effect -- political reconciliation between Sunnis and Shi'ites -- has yet to be achieved, and many in Congress are clamoring to begin withdrawing troops soon.

Pace spoke with the AP at a US military headquarters on the outskirts of the capital after meeting with commanders and conferring by secure video teleconference with Bush.

He also conferred with Petraeus and Lieutenant General Raymond Odierno, the number two commander in Iraq, who said he did not currently foresee requesting more troops.

"My assessment right now is I need more time" to understand how the offensive that is targeting Al Qaeda in Iraq is working and how it could lead to political progress, Odierno said.

Pace said he saw signs of improvement since his previous visit in April, based in part on a 30-minute aerial tour of Baghdad in a Black Hawk helicopter and on private talks with commanders.

"The surge is having very good positive results on the streets of Baghdad," he said. "We have yet to see the political progress and results that you would hope to see."

Some on the Joint Chiefs had argued against the US troops boost , in part out of concern that it could not be sustained long enough to have the desired effect and that it would put too much strain on the military.

The chiefs for a number of weeks have been studying the timing of a possible US military transition away from today's combat-oriented mission to one focused mainly on training Iraqi security forces while also protecting Iraq's borders and continuing the fight against terrorists.

Ellie

thedrifter
07-17-07, 11:11 AM
Pace gives brighter outlook on Iraq security
By Robert Burns - The Associated Press
Posted : Tuesday Jul 17, 2007 7:19:39 EDT

RAMADI, Iraq — In his most optimistic remarks since the U.S. troop buildup began, Gen. Peter Pace, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said Tuesday that Iraq has undergone a “sea change” in security in recent months, and that this will influence his recommendation to President Bush on how long to continue the current strategy.

After conferring with Maj. Gen. Walter Gaskin and other commanders in this provincial capital west of Baghdad, Pace told reporters he has gathered a positive picture of the security environment not only here but also in Baghdad, where he began his Iraq visit on Monday.

He was asked whether this would inform his thinking about whether to continue the current strategy, with extra U.S. troops battling to secure Baghdad and Anbar province.

“It will because what I’m hearing now is a sea change that is taking place in many places here,” he replied. “It’s no longer a matter of pushing al-Qaida out of Ramadi, for example, but rather — now that they have been pushed out — helping the local police and the local army have a chance to get their feet on the ground and set up their systems.”

Pace said earlier in Baghdad that the U.S. military is continuing various options for Iraq, including an even bigger troop buildup if President Bush thinks his “surge” strategy needs a further boost.

Pace said the chiefs of the Army, Marine Corps, Navy and Air Force are developing their own assessment of the situation in Iraq, to be presented to Bush in September, that will be separate from a report to Congress that month by Gen. David Petraeus, the top commander for Iraq.

The military must “be prepared for whatever it’s going to look like two months from now,” Pace said Monday in an interview with two reporters traveling with him to Iraq from Washington.

“That way, if we need to plus-up or come down” in numbers of troops in Iraq, the details will have been studied, he said.

Pace, on his first visit since U.S. commanders accelerated combat operations in mid-June, said another option under consideration is maintaining current troop levels beyond September.

There are now about 158,000 U.S. troops in Iraq, reflecting a boost of about 30,000 to carry out the new strategy Bush announced in January. The plan is focused on providing better security for Iraqis in Baghdad, but the intended effect — political reconciliation between Sunnis and Shiites — has yet to be achieved, and many in Congress are clamoring to begin withdrawing troops soon.

In Washington on Monday, Senate Democratic leader Harry Reid said he would force the chamber’s first all-night debate on the Iraq war Tuesday night in advance of a vote Wednesday on whether to bring home all combat troops by next spring.

Republicans are using Senate rules to insist that the measure have 60 votes to pass — a de facto filibuster since it takes that many votes to cut off debate.

Pace conferred Monday with Petraeus and Lt. Gen. Raymond Odierno, the No. 2 commander in Iraq, who said he did not currently foresee requesting more troops.

“Right now, I can’t find an assessment where I would say I need more troops,” Odierno said, adding that he is confident that by September he will be able to give Petraeus his advice on how the troop buildup is working.

“My assessment right now is, I need more time” to understand how the offensive targeting al-Qaida in Iraq is working and how it could lead to political progress, Odierno said.

“I’m seeing some progress now here in Iraq. We have really just started what the Iraqis term ‘liberating’ them from al-Qaida. What I’ve got to determine is, what do I need in order to continue that progress so that the political piece can then take hold and Iraqi security forces can hold this for the long term?”

Ellie