PDA

View Full Version : Iraq, the vets' view



thedrifter
07-14-07, 07:36 AM
Iraq, the vets' view
A reckless minority of troops has declared war on all Iraqis.
By Chris Hedges, CHRIS HEDGES is the author, most recently, of "American Fascists: The Christian Right and the War on America." A longer report, based on troop interviews, by Hedges and Al-Arian, appears in the July 3
July 14, 2007

AFTER FOUR YEARS of war, most Americans still remain sheltered from the day-to-day realities of the occupation of Iraq, especially its effects on Iraqis. With reporter Laila Al-Arian, I spent the last few months interviewing 50 combat veterans, and in thousands of pages of transcripts, they told a brutal story.

With extraordinary honesty, these veterans — medics, MPs, artillerymen, snipers, officers and others — revealed disturbing patterns of behavior by American troops: innocents terrorized during midnight raids, civilian cars fired on when they got too close to supply convoys and troops opening up on vehicles that zip past poorly marked checkpoints, only to discover that they'd shot a 3-year-old or an elderly man. The campaign against a mostly invisible enemy, many veterans said, has given rise to a culture of fear and even hatred among U.S. forces, many of whom, losing ground and beleaguered, have, in effect, declared war on all Iraqis.

The interviewed vets, who served in 2003, 2004 and 2005, emphasized that indiscriminate killing of civilians was carried out by a minority within their ranks. But most also agreed that such killings rarely spark investigations and almost never incur punishment.

Checkpoints, according to more than two dozen troops who manned them, have become particular flashpoints for violence.

"This unit sets up this traffic control point, and this 18-year-old kid is on top of an armored Humvee with a .50-caliber machinegun," said Geoffrey Millard, 26, of Buffalo, N.Y., who served in Tikrit as assistant to a general and often sat in on high-level briefings on such actions. "This car speeds at him pretty quick, and he makes a split-second decision that that's a suicide bomber, and he … puts 200 rounds in less than a minute into this vehicle. It killed the mother, a father and two kids. "They briefed this to the general," Millard said, "and they briefed it gruesome. I mean, they had pictures…. And this colonel turns around to this full division staff and says, 'If these [expletive deleted] hajjis learned to drive, this [expletive deleted] wouldn't happen.' "

Sgt. Camilo Mejía, 31, of Miami, told a similar story: An unarmed man driving a car was decapitated by a .50-caliber machine gun in front of his young son. Such accidents of war happen, but in Mejía's experience — he served in Iraq for six months starting in April 2003 — they weren't rare: "This sort of killing of civilians had long ceased to arouse much interest or even comment."

Speeding American convoys and patrols, manned by troops who are terrified of becoming targets, have become another consistent source of civilian casualties.

"We'd be cruising down the road in a convoy and all of the sudden, an IED blows up," said Spc. Ben Schrader, 27, of Ft. Collins, Colo. "You've got these scared kids on these guns, and they just start opening fire. And there could be innocent people everywhere. And I've seen this, I mean, on numerous occasions, where innocent people died because we're cruising down and a bomb goes off."

Worse yet were home raids, or "cordon and search" operations. Twenty-four vets who participated in the raids described them as a relentless reality of the occupation. Generally on little evidence, Iraqis were rousted in the night, their homes turned upside down, the family patriarchs humiliated and sometimes arrested.

Staff Sgt. Timothy Westphal, 31, of Denver, said that he'll never forget one on a hot summer night in 2004. He and more than 40 other soldiers raided a farm near Tikrit and, pointing their rifles and lights at a group of sleepers, woke them up.

"The man screamed this gut-wrenching, blood-curdling, just horrified scream," Westphal recalled. "I've never heard anything like that."

It turned out the people weren't insurgents but a family sleeping outside to escape the heat.

"I just remember thinking to myself, I just brought terror to someone else under the American flag," Westphal said, "and that's just not what I joined the Army to do."

Soldiers and Marines who carried out hundreds of such raids said they rarely turned up anything of consequence — a small piece of wire or a detonating cord might be considered a major find. The troops also told me that many members of their units viewed Iraqis as little better than animals. "Hajji," an Arabic term for those who've made the hajj pilgrimage to Mecca, has become the slur of choice for U.S. troops. The troops regularly denigrate "hajji food" and "hajji homes" and throw around terms like "camel jockey." Two veterans reported seeing the corpses of dead Iraqis grotesquely abused by American troops.

The antipathy toward Iraqis was confirmed in a survey released in May by the Pentagon. Just 47% of soldiers and 38% of Marines agreed that civilians should be treated with dignity and respect. Only 55% of soldiers and 40% of Marines said they would report a unit member who had killed or injured "an innocent noncombatant."

The veterans who were interviewed had little good to say about senior military officers, many of whom encouraged reckless behavior — even though they spent most of their time in heavily fortified compounds and rarely saw combat. Mejía said that, before deploying to Iraq, his battalion commander announced that he would not return home without a Combat Infantry Badge, awarded only after a unit has received enemy fire.

"This badge is a great honor," Mejía said, "but going out of one's way to engage in combat, just to get a badge, is something few service members would accept. Yet once in Iraq, that is precisely what many soldiers believed our commanders to be doing."

The war in Iraq is leaving thousands of young men and women who have returned home deeply disturbed by what they have done and witnessed. It is also turning huge swaths of the Arab and Muslim world against us.

We need to muster the moral courage to face the reality of the war. To wallow in a myth that trumpets our goodness, denies our irresponsible rules of engagement and demonizes those who oppose us will leave us unable to end the occupation and begin the long, slow process of reconciliation.

Ellie

thedrifter
07-14-07, 07:40 AM
July 13, 2007

While Bush Grey Washes Iraq Claiming Progress, Vets Get Out the Truth

By Kevin Zeese

Iraq Vets Break Through to Let Americans Know
the Brutal Reality of U.S. Occupation


While the Bush administration is trying to paint an improving picture in Iraq, veterans of the Iraq occupation are finding their voice. And, they are painting a picture of the U.S. role in Iraq that demonstrates why it is urgent for the United States to withdraw.


The voices of Iraq Vets have been so effective that the military has tried to silence their leaders with disciplinary efforts, but this has only given them more attention in the media. And, it has enraged vets that when they come home from risking their lives for a war started on false pretenses that the military is trying to muzzle them – prevent them from exercising their First Amendment rights on the most important political issue of the day.


Next week Iraq Veterans Against the War will be announcing a new campaign, the Tri-Folded Flag Campaign, that will make the point that “Funding the War is Killing the Troops.” This campaign is designed to hold the Congress responsible for their role in continuing the war. In particular, they will focus on Speaker Nancy Pelosi, Majority Leader Steny Hoyer and Democratic Whip James Clyburn. More than 1,800 tri-folded flags will be delivered to their offices representing the U.S. soldiers killed since the Democrats took control of the Congress. The announcement event will be on Tuesday, July 17 in Washington, DC and the campaign will continue through September.

And, the Nation Magazine is featuring the voices of Iraq vets in an article by Chris Hedges & Laila Al-Arian. They write about interviews they conducted with 50 Iraq war veterans that describe in vivid detail how the war is really being conducted and how civilians in Iraq are being mistreated, brutalized and killed. Killing of civilians is common. The article states: “The killing of unarmed Iraqis was so common many of the troops said it became an accepted part of the daily landscape.”

The article, “The Other War: Iraq Vets Bear Witness,” describes the effects of “the four-year-old occupation on average Iraqi civilians” as well as the “deep emotional and physical scars” U.S. vets hold as a result of their participation in the occupation. The article describes the “brutal side of the war rarely seen on television screens or chronicled in newspaper accounts.”

The authors summarize their findings writing:

“Their stories, recorded and typed into thousands of pages of transcripts, reveal disturbing patterns of behavior by American troops in Iraq. Dozens of those interviewed witnessed Iraqi civilians, including children, dying from American firepower. Some participated in such killings; others treated or investigated civilian casualties after the fact. Many also heard such stories, in detail, from members of their unit. The soldiers, sailors and marines emphasized that not all troops took part in indiscriminate killings. Many said that these acts were perpetrated by a minority. But they nevertheless described such acts as common and said they often go unreported--and almost always go unpunished.”

One vet summed it up saying “I guess while I was there, the general attitude was, A dead Iraqi is just another dead Iraqi.” Another described the attitude as “a lot of guys really supported that whole concept that, you know, if they don't speak English and they have darker skin, they're not as human as us, so we can do what we want.”

A dozen described open racism with ridicule of Iraqis in racist terms, with troops deriding “haji food,” “haji music” and “haji homes.” One soldier described the impact of this racism, “By calling them names they're not people anymore. They're just objects.”

This article was brought to life by Amy Goodman of Democracy Now who interviewed some of the veterans interviewed in the article on her nationally syndicated radio and television show.

The voices of Iraq veterans are becoming more and more important as the Bush administration continues to take a misleading approach to what is happening in Iraq. The administration’s July 12th report on ‘progress’ in Iraq that tries to “grey wash” reality – a white wash would just have not passed the straight face test as enough information is escaping about Iraq so that most Americans and members of Congress know things are going poorly. The grey the administration attempts to paint is really much darker. Iraq is a disaster, even the Green Zone is not safe anymore.

As Staff Sgt. Timothy John Westphal concluded on Democracy Now “we need to bring our troops home right now, because all we’re doing is making more terrorists and more people who hate America.”

Opposition to the war by veterans is not new. Many vets who see the reality on the ground in Iraq have become opponents of the occupation. More than a year ago a Zogby poll of Iraq soldiers found that 72% of the troops want the U.S. should withdraw in a year, now more and more troops are becoming vocal in their opposition to the war and their lack faith in their commander in chief. Polls of Military Times readers have found growing disenchantment with the war and loss of faith in the Commander-in-Chief.

The Zogby poll and poll of readers of Military Times are confirmed by a recent DoD May 4, 2007 survey by the Pentagon’s Office of the Surgeon General of the US Army Medical Command which found just 47 percent of soldiers and 38 percent of marines agreed that civilians should be treated with dignity and respect. Only 55% of soldiers and 40% of marines said they would report a unit member who had killed or injured a civilian.

While politicians in Washington position themselves for the 2008 election and President Bush puts forward his uncompromising stay the course stubbornness despite reality things continue to deteriorate in Iraq. There is no question that the Democrats in Congress have the power to end the war. For example, the Democrats could filibuster continued funding unless it includes an exit from Iraq. The Republican minority has used the filibuster to continue the war but the Democrats don’t use their power to end it. And certainly President Bush as commander in chief could end the war.

Yet the war drags on and every day more soldiers and their families suffer the consequences of death, maiming and psychological trauma and at the same time Iraqis suffer the painful existence of being occupied with thousands of civilians killed every month, life without electricity, adequate food, fuel and other necessities of life as well as millions exiled and displaced.

Where will the leadership come to end the war? We must look to ourselves and bring elected ‘leaders’ with us. They are better at following then leading.

Ellie