PDA

View Full Version : Death-for-Rushdie Advocate Headlined Live Earth Concert


thedrifter
07-08-07, 08:13 AM
July 08, 2007
Death-for-Rushdie Advocate Headlined Live Earth Concert
By Peter Barry Chowka

[Editor's note: This is a revised and extended version of a blog which appeared yesterday]

On July 4, the Web site of Live Earth announced that "music legend" Yusuf (formerly Yusuf Islam, formerly Cat Stevens, and before that Steven Demetre Georgiou) would headline the Live Earth concert in Hamburg, Germany on July 7, closing the show there. This is a man who has advocated Salman Rushdie's death. According to press reports, he closed the show.

For anyone who has somehow managed to escape the hype, Live Earth was a "24-hour, 7-continent concert series taking place on 7/7/07 that brought together more than 100 music artists and 2 billion people to trigger a global movement to solve the climate crisis" a.k.a. "Global Warming." Former U.S. VP Al Gore, Jr. and his Alliance for Climate Protection (he's the chairman of the board) were partners in Live Earth with Kevin Wall, a producer of the previous international crypto "We Are The World" mega event, the July 2005 Live 8 concerts.

Gore appeared and spoke at the Washington, D.C. Live Earth event on the Mall and in Giants Stadium in New Jersey, shuttling between the two venues by energy-efficient train, having given up on plans to do London and New York on the same day, for fear of being cricized for his energey usage. He appeared at other venues by satellite. In the U.S., NBC owned TV networks and cable channels devoted several score hours of programming to Live Earth all day Saturday July 7 and into the next day. It was streamed on the Internet by MSN.

Back to Yusuf: In February 1989, Iran's Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini issued a fatwa calling for the execution of author Salman Rushdie, accused of blaspheming Islam in his best selling novel The Satanic Verses. Yusuf, at the time going by the name Yusuf Islam (he converted to Islam in the 1970s and gave up playing music soon after), was asked about the controversy during a British television program, "A Satanic Scenario," taped on April 15, 1989 and broadcast nationally on Britain's Independent Television Network the following month.

According to an article by Craig R. Whitney in the New York Times, "Cat Stevens Gives Support To Call for Death of Rushdie" published on May 22, 1989, "rather than go to a demonstration to burn an effigy of the author Salman Rushdie" Yusuf said on the program that (direct quote) "I would have hoped that it'd be the real thing." Whitney went on to report:
He also said that if Mr. Rushdie turned up at his doorstep looking for help, "I might ring somebody who might do more damage to him than he would like."

"I'd try to phone the Ayatollah Khomeini and tell him exactly where this man is," said Mr. Islam, who watched a preview of the program today and said in an interview that he stood by his comments.
Two months before the ITN program taping, on February 21, 1989, Yusuf was asked about the fatwa during a speech at Kingston University in London. According to Wikipedia, "He claims to have stated only the legal consequences from the Qur'an-that blasphemy is a capital offense-and not actually have made any claims of support for the fatwa." Newspapers, however, rushed to criticize Yusuf for allegedly supporting Rushdie's killing. The controversy spread to the U.S., where Cat Stevens' music was banned by many radio stations and Los Angeles talk radio host Tom Leykis used a bulldozer to destroy thousands of Stevens' records and CDs.

Yusuf remained quiet about the controversy for years. In a fawning interview, "Cat Stevens Breaks His Silence," published June 14, 2000, Rolling Stone took his side in the dispute. In the interview's introduction, Andrew Dansby wrote, inaccurately as it turns out (keep reading):
For more than a decade, Islam's name has been mud for "endorsing" the Ayatollah's fatwa against author Salman Rushdie for writing The Satanic Verses. If you're enamored with the notion of an endless scavenger hunt, try to find that endorsement somewhere in writing. As happens, with the passing of time fiction become fact, myth becomes legend.
In the Rolling Stone interview, Yusuf said:

I had nothing to do with the issue other than what the media created. I was innocently drawn into the whole controversy. . .

For years after that, I have been viewed as someone capable of saying such words and doing such things, which I never actually said or did!
Dansby, the interviewer, asked Yusuf this leading question:
Did you consider taking legal action?
Yusuf: Legal action was never considered; in retrospect, perhaps it should have been.
Today, Yusuf is back to his silent ways. On July 6, 2007, The Times (London), published a lengthy, positive feature article about Yusuf's comeback as a musician, "Notions of Islam." According to the author of the article, Pete Paphides, "Because he refuses to talk about the quotes attributed to him during the Salman Rushdie furore, it's impossible to discover whether his views on that fatwa have moderated." The article noted that Yusuf has applied to the Brent Council to build a £4.5 Islamic cultural center on the grounds of an old church.

After all of the denials and obfuscations by Yusuf and the white washings by much of the mainstream media that have gone on ever since 1989, the smoking gun is now available. YouTube hosts a 3-minute excerpt of the April 15, 1989 "Satanic Scenario" program and Yusuf Islam can be seen and clearly heard making the statements about harming and burning Rushdie attributed to him by Whitney in the New York Times.

In addition, the video clip on YouTube of "A Satanic Scenario" (the show was part of Hypotheticals, a series produced by ITN) featured the following exchange between program host Geoffrey Robinson QC (Queen's Counsel) and Yusuf Islam (he was using both names then):
Geoffrey Robinson QC: You don't think that this man deserves to die?

Yusuf Islam: Who, Salman Rushdie?

Robinson: Yes.

Yusuf Islam: Yes, Yes.

Robinson: And do you have a duty to be his executioner?

Yusuf Islam: No, not necessarily, unless we were in an Islamic state and I was ordered, let's say, by the judge or by the authority to carry out such an act perhaps. Yes.
Another lengthy puff piece about Yusuf, "The Year of the Cat," was published by the Telegraph (London) Seven Magazine on April 29, 2007.

In response, in what should be the last word on the subject (apparently Al Gore wasn't paying attention-or maybe he was), Salman Rushie, in a letter titled "Cat Stevens Wanted Me Dead" published by the Sunday Telegraph on May 6, 2007, had this to say:

However much Cat Stevens/Yusuf Islam may wish to rewrite his past, he was neither misunderstood nor misquoted over his views on the Khomeini fatwa against The Satanic Verses (Seven, April 29). In an article in The New York Times on May 22, 1989, Craig R Whitney reported Stevens/Islam saying on a British television programme "that rather than go to a demonstration to burn an effigy of the author Salman Rushdie, 'I would have hoped that it'd be the real thing'.'"

He added that "if Mr Rushdie turned up at his doorstep looking for help, 'I might ring somebody who might do more damage to him than he would like. I'd try to phone the Ayatollah Khomeini and tell him exactly where this man is'.'"

In a subsequent interview with The New York Times, Mr Whitney added, Stevens/Islam, who had seen a preview of the programme, said that he "stood by his comments".

Let's have no more rubbish about how "green" and innocent this man was.

Ellie

thedrifter
07-08-07, 08:15 AM
July 06, 2007
Al Gore's Live Earth: Has Global Warming Hysteria 'Jumped the Shark'
By John Berlau

This weekend, rock stars will jet around the world, cars and buses will clog traffic, and elaborate sound stages will be set up to burn massive amounts of fuel to send the message to fans at home that they had better conserve their energy or face the allegedly dire threat of global warming.

The Live Earth concerts, which start this Saturday, July 7, are also one last chance for Baby Boomers to relive the "flower power" activism of the '60s. In a recent interview in Rolling Stone, former Vice President Al Gore invoked music icon Bob Dylan to promote the importance of these concerts. Citing Dylan's '60 anthem "The Times They Are A-Changin'". Gore rambled: "What's the old Bob Dylan line? 'Come senators, congressmen, please heed the call/Rattle your windows' - what's the rest of it? - 'for the times they are a-changin'."

But there's just one problem with invoking Dylan to hype the global warming scare. And that is that Dylan himself has expressed skepticism -- to the same magazine -- at the notion that global warming is a catastrophe. When he was asked by Rolling Stone founder and publisher Jann Wenner in the magazine's 40th anniversary issue if he worried about global warming, Dylan replied with an unexpected rejoinder. He asked Wenner, "Where's the global warming? It's freezing here." Wenner, who has blanketed Rolling Stone and his other magazine Men's Journal with doom-and gloom climate change stories (that often bash my organization, the Competitive Enterprise Institute), quickly moved on to other topics after he received his comeuppance.

Yet Dylan's latest statement may signal that in the global warming debate, the times are changing. Even independent-minded celebrities are now questioning the establishment media orthodoxy that the debate over global warming and its effects are all but over. In a phrase familiar to those who study pop culture, it appears that the global warming scare may have "jumped the shark."

"Jump the shark" refers to the precise moment at which a TV program loses momentum or begins the process of losing the element that made the show popular. The phrase comes specifically from an episode of Happy Days in which Fonzie jumps over a shark with water skis. Fans argue that the show became less realistic after that. The web site JumpTheShark.com is dedicated to fans debating the precise moment their favorite programs "jumped the shark."

But "jumping the shark" can also refer to a trend or even a line of argument. And as a post on the web site Moonbattery.com has noted, environmentalists' sky-is-falling global warming rhetoric is jumping the shark because of its inconsistencies and contradictions. Bob Dylan has always been something of an iconoclast and has strayed from the party line more than his liberal fans would like to admit (for a list of examples see the web site RightWingBob.com.). But I think on a basic level, it's hard to convince a man who grew in the bitter cold climate of Hibbing, Minnesota that a few degrees of warming over the next century will be that much of a problem.

Other rock stars are questioning the very purpose of the concert. Bob Geldof, who put together the "Live Aid" concerts of the '80s to combat starvation in Africa, asked: "Why is [Gore] actually organizing them? To make us aware of the greenhouse effect? ... We are all [expletive] conscious of global warming."


Similarly, the Who's Roger Daltrey told the London Sun: "I can't believe it. Let's burn even more fuel." Then, in a rare bit of humility for famous entertainers, Daltrey argued that it's possible that rock stars may not have all the answers. "We have problems with global warming, but the questions and the answers are so huge I don't know what a rock concert's ever going to do to help," he said.

And the latest is from the new band Arctic Monkeys, who expressed skepticism about the concert to the French wire service AFP. "It's a bit patronizing for us 21 year olds to try to start to change the world," drummer Matt Helders said. "Especially when we're using enough power for 10 houses just for (stage) lighting. It'd be a bit hypocritical."

To be sure, not all these musicians are ready to embrace the CEI side of the debate. But acknowledging there are complexities is first step to halting global warming hysteria. What Geldof in particular seemed to realize is that the arguments to stop global warming are persuasive not because warming itself is bad (indeed, there could be many benefits), but of the effects it may allegedly cause, such as the worsening of drought and malaria. Whereas Geldof's Live Aid raised money that directly went to buying food for Africa's poor (although there were some problems with distribution, as there are in many food aid programs), it's unclear how the "Live Earth" concerts will improve anyone's life.

And environmentalists have rejected solutions to the problems they say global warming will worsen. Indeed, as I show in my book Eco-Freaks: Environmentalism Is Hazardous to Your Health, environmentalists have created their own public health crises with many of their "solutions." It was not global warming but the banning of the pesticide DDT -- inspired by the hysterics of Gore's heroine Rachel Carson -- that has led to millions dying of malaria in the Third World.

And there is even a question about how seriously environmentalists take the global warming "threat." After all most eco-groups are opposed to nuclear power, which involves no pollution and carbon dioxide emissions. And they want to shut down the non-polluting dams that provide electricity in the Pacific Northwest, which would result in a sharp increase of the dreaded coal and oil to provide power. These are even bigger hypocrisies than a fuel-burning concert, and provide even more evidence that global warming hysteria is jumping the shark.

Ellie