PDA

View Full Version : Command Sergeant Major Ciotola on Harry Reid


thedrifter
07-03-07, 10:57 AM
Command Sergeant Major Ciotola on Harry Reid - MUST READ of the DAY
Posted By Blackfive

This is about as tough a chops bustin' as you will hear in the papers. Can't believe they printed it.

The Command Sergeant Major (top enlisted soldier in Iraq) is sick and tired - like you - of defeatist politicians, throwing whole countries, their own troops, and the best interests of this country, under the bus to serve their political needs.

First, a General reacts to them. Now, a Command Sergeant Major. I sure hope the Senate has their ears open today.

This story from the Newark (NJ) Star Ledger is making the email rounds this morning. The ending line by the Sergeant Major is priceless - right up there with "Stuck on Stupid."

Read it. Print it. Email this to everyone you know. The reporter, Wayne Woolley, has an email address listed at the end of his article. Shoot him an email for printing the reaction of the CSM.

A tough man for a tough job
U.S. troop safety is the duty of a Jerseyan bent on winning

Tuesday, July 03, 2007

BY WAYNE WOOLLEY
Star-Ledger Staff

The troops fighting in Iraq usually keep quiet when they hear critics say the war is going poorly.

Command Sgt. Maj. Neil Ciotola is a notable exception.

The 49-year-old Elizabeth native, who is serving as the top enlisted soldier in Iraq, had a visceral reaction in May when Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid said "this war is lost."

Ciotola described his reaction to a reporter from the Tampa Tribune this way: "I felt compelled to pull out my sidearm," using military parlance for an urge to pull his gun.

In a wide-ranging phone interview from Iraq yesterday, Ciotola said his choice of words, which are extreme even by battlefield standards, came because his "emotions got the best of me." But Ciotola said his words were guided by his continued belief that military failure in Iraq is an option America cannot afford.

"How dare anyone say we've lost when we've lost more than 3,600 young men and women here and had another 27,000 wounded," Ciotola said. "To say that's been for naught is simply wrong. Don't tell me we're losing. Don't tell me we've lost."

Taking combat losses personally is part of Ciotola's job.

As the command sergeant major for Multi-National Corps Iraq, he has the primary responsibility for the safety and discipline of all enlisted soldiers, sailors, airmen and Marines in Iraq. He's also a principal adviser to Lt. Gen. Ray mond Odierno, the day-to-day commander in Iraq and a native of Rockaway. Their leadership team is about halfway through its 15-month tour in Iraq.

The fact that two guys with Jersey accents and Italian surnames have such high profiles in Iraq isn't lost on the troops, who make their share of Sopranos jokes, said Cio tola, who was born in Elizabeth and later lived in Union and Springfield. He enlisted in 1976, after graduating from Thomas Edison Vocational Technical School.

While Odierno sets broad war policies and meets with top officials in Iraq's government, Ciotola's job is to focus on the welfare of the grunts in the trenches.

To that end, Ciotola spends at least four days a week outside Camp Victory, the heavily fortified American military headquarters on Baghdad's western edge. The former tank driver recently joined an infantry unit for a house-to-house hunt for insurgents in Baquba. He's also spending an increasing amount of time in the hundreds of combat outposts the American military has set up in and around Baghdad as it shifts thousands of troops out of remote bases and into urban areas as part of the troop "surge."

Ciotola said the aim of his fieldwork is to collect as much information as he can about the things that are killing American troops and come up with recommendations to counter them. In addition to the roadside bombs, Ciotola said the newest emerging threats are from snipers and the troop surge it self. "It creates a target-rich environment for the bad guys," he said.

As the number of American troops has increased this year, so have the number killed. In May, the death tally reached 126, and in June it was 101, two of the highest months since the war began.

To Ciotola, however, the strategy of more troops ultimately represents the best hope for curbing the violence in Iraq. That's because when more troops are in intimate contact with ordinary citizens, Ciotola believes the Iraqis will come to the conclusion that Americans care more about their welfare than the insurgents.

"As soon as you look these people in the eyes and you smile, it melts barriers," Ciotola said.

In addition to greater stability in Baghdad over the past six months, Ciotola also sees other signs of progress. In addition to improvements in the performance of the Iraqi Army and police, he also sees the Iraqi government begin ning to show competence in tasks like stringing electrical power lines and laying water and sewer pipes.

Other hopeful signals come from business startups in Baghdad, including what appears to be a re bound in the nation's agriculture industry, especially its export of dates, which once generated international sales of $1 billion each year.

Ciotola said that the troops he meets every day are the ones who often point out those signs of progress to him. He said none of the troops he talks to believe the war is being lost. And that's a good thing.

"I will not permit a defeatist at titude to raise its ugly head in this command," Ciotolo said. "We are going to win this son of a *****."

Wayne Woolley may be reached at wwoolley@starledger.com or (973)-392-1559.

Ellie

thedrifter
07-03-07, 10:59 AM
General Wolff in Iraq: Democratic Senate Caucus is Wrong
Posted By Grim

Last week's final Blogger Roundtable was with Brigadier General Terry Wolff, US Army. The transcript is here; audio is here; Wolff's bio is here. The document I mention in my question, from the Democratic Caucus' Senate Journal, can be found here.

GRIM: I noticed -- we were talking earlier about the Washington clock. I noticed yesterday in a document that was really about -- it was really a partisan document issued by the Senate majority leader's office [GRIM: my bad memory -- it was actually from the Democratic Caucus's Senate office] about Republican obstructionism. As sort of a throwaway line at the last part of the document, it said that several hundred soldiers have died in Bush's failed surge policy. Do you feel that it is fair to say that the surge has failed?

GEN. WOLFF: No. Simple answer is no. I mean, I think you have to see how this plays out over time. And again, you know, eight months ago, everyone was talking to us about insurgencies take time, and that they have to be dealt with on more than just the security front. And we know that is true.

So the first task was to get additional soldiers in here. And the last of those five brigades has only been on the ground a couple of weeks, and it's just begun combat operations. And so in concert with the Iraqis, it's going to take a little bit of time to clear the areas that have not been cleared in a long time.

Again, you know, six weeks ago, eight weeks ago, 10 weeks ago, four months ago, everyone was seized with Baghdad. Well, other than the occasional, you know, large-scale IED or suicide vest or car bomb that gets through the checkpoints and other things here -- most of the surge forces are now operating in the -- in -- if you will, in the Baghdad belt or the other areas that surround Baghdad or reach up into Diyala and to Baqubah.

And so, again, you know, we tend to be fixated on, is this thing going to produce a result in -- you know, in the next 48 hours? And the answer is absolutely not.

The question is, you know, do we have the wherewithal to allow it to proceed long enough to determine whether it's going to succeed or not? And I think that's one of the key issues that has to be thought through.

Q I have a quick follow-up question. You say the Iraqis are very keenly aware of the Washington clock as well. Does that include the Iraqis on the other side?

GEN. WOLFF: You mean the bad guys?

Q Yes.

GEN. WOLFF: Yeah, sure. I mean, how would you not know that if you're an Iraqi bad guy, whether you're an al Qaeda guy or you're -- whether -- you know, someone in -- you know, someone from the bad side of JAM, which is causing -- you know, causing extrajudicial killings? How would you not know that if you're looking at the Western media, the Iraq media, the Arabic media? I mean, what happens in the United States in the capital -- in our capital of Washington is playing out all over media headlines.

So all you got to do is have a satellite dish now. I mean, I could see BBC at just, you know, a flick of a dial here, or take a look at CNN or take a look at any one of several Iraqi stations or Arabic stations. So to think that's -- to think that our opponents aren't looking at our -- the Western media and determining will, American will, is silly.

Q So these statements have consequences, then, on the battlefield.

GEN. WOLFF: Well, yeah, of course. All of our statements do. And so, I mean, again, you know, our politicians have a responsibility to the American people, and so do we. And we have to recognize that things play out in the media. And there are -- that's just a fact.

That's a pretty straightfoward answer. To say the Surge "has failed" is flat wrong as a matter of military reality. It's just getting started.

These statements, issued as part of a political game, have an impact on the battlefield. They encourage the enemy, and demoralize both our troops and our friends.

Our politicians have a responsibility to the American people. It includes thinking about how their statements play in the media, about how they are affecting the battle in which American forces are engaged.

Let me repeat that one last time: Our politicians have a responsibility to the American people. It's time they started living up to it.

Ellie