PDA

View Full Version : Gay vets say policy hurts the military


thedrifter
06-22-07, 06:12 AM
Gay vets say policy hurts the military
'Don't Ask, Don't Tell' looms over ceremony at Daley Plaza to honor service

By Azam Ahmed
Tribune staff reporter

June 22, 2007

Alexander Nicholson speaks five languages, including Arabic, but he will never be allowed to serve in the U.S. Army again.

Outed by a service member who discovered he was gay, Nicholson was honorably discharged just six months after the Sept. 11 attacks under the "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" policy, which only allows lesbians and gay men to serve in the military if they keep quiet about their sexual orientation.

"I think this is a prime example of politics damaging the readiness of the armed forces," said Nicholson, who is pursuing a doctorate in political science. "Once I was outed, they were forced to discharge me because of the law, over the objection of my brigade commander,"

At a time when the U.S. military is struggling to retain and recruit soldiers, particularly those with foreign language skills, Nicholson says he would like back into the Army. Only he can't return.

On Thursday, Nicholson met in Chicago with other military veterans and former officials from across the nation who say they have struggled under "Don't Ask, Don't Tell."

They came together to be part of an event to salute gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender veterans, a ceremony that organizers said was the only one of its kind sponsored by a major city.

But the event also drew attention to what Nicholson and other service members called an outdated and unfair policy.

"This is to show the kind of people the military is losing, either because they are being kicked out or are not re-enlisting because of the 'Don't Ask, Don't Tell' policy," Nicholson said.

Among those at Thursday's event were a Korean linguist, an explosives officer and a public information officer. Former service members who participated included Edward Zasadil, an 82-year-old World War II veteran who carried the American flag at Thursday's ceremony.About 800 service members dismissed since the law took effect 14 years ago had been determined "mission critical" by the Pentagon, a 2005 government report found. Studies put the number of gay service members currently serving in the military at about 65,000.

The armed services must enforce the law, Pentagon spokesman Stewart Upton said. "The Department of Defense must ensure that the standards for enlistment and appointment of members of the armed forces reflect the policies set forth by Congress," Upton wrote in an e-mail.

Effort to repeal law



U.S. Rep. Marty Meehan (D-Mass.), a senior member of the House Armed Services Committee, introduced legislation in 2005 to repeal the law and replace it with a new policy of non-discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation. The bill has about 120 sponsors.

Meanwhile, the military continues to suffer under "Don't Ask, Don't Tell," critics say.

"The shortage of Arabic speakers is dire, and one important context of this policy is what it means for the military when we fire badly needed doctors and linguists because of sexual orientation," said Aaron Belkin, director of the University of California, Santa Barbara's Palm Center, a think tank that studies sexual minorities and social policy. "This policy is not about military effect. It's about animus, bigotry and intolerance."

A total of 58 Arabic-language specialists have been removed for their orientation, Belkin said. The Pentagon estimates the number to be much lower.

Rear Admiral Alan Steinman, a physician who is the highest-ranking former military official to come out as openly gay, said that he viewed the policy as a threat to national security because of the number of qualified people who are either removed or opt not to serve because of the policy.

"Our nation needs to appreciate that our gay men and women in the military are as valuable as anyone else serving," Steinman said.

Nearly 11,000 service members have been dismissed since the law went into effect in 1993, according to the Defense Department. But critics say those numbers don't include people who simply decide not to re-enlist because of the policy.

That figure is close to 2,500 a year, said Gary Gates, senior research fellow at the University of California, Los Angeles' Williams Institute, a think tank focusing on sexual orientation law and public policy.

Antonio Agnone said he left the Marines because he felt insecure about where the policy would leave him and his partner if he were to be injured while disarming bombs in Iraq. Because he could never inform anyone of his relationship with his partner, "the military would never let [my partner] know what happened to me," he said.

'I didn't want to get out'

Agnone, who joined the Marines in 2002, was deployed to Iraq in 2005 where part of his responsibility was to locate and diffuse improvised explosive devices. "I didn't want to get out of the service. But I didn't realize the full impact of 'Don't Ask, Don't Tell' until I was deployed overseas," said Agnone, 27.

Julianne Sohn, 30, now works for the Los Angeles Police Department, where she says her sexual orientation is embraced.

"But if the military were to repeal 'Don't Ask, Don't Tell,' I'd rejoin tomorrow," said Sohn, a former public affairs officer. "I left because I was so stressed out from having to hide."

Sohn said that many of the people she worked with understood her predicament, even if it was never spoken about outright.

A December 2006 Zogby poll of service members who had served in Iraq or Afghanistan found that three-quarters felt comfortable around gays and lesbians.

Jarrod Chlapowski, a former Army serviceman, said that he met a number of gays when he served as a Korean linguist. He eventually even told his fellow soldiers about his orientation.

"No one freaked out over my being gay," he said.

But later in his service, he began to hide again as he was switched to work in different areas after witnessing a number of discharges of gays and lesbians. In 2005, he ended his Army career as a result.

--------

aahmed@tribune.com

Ellie

thedrifter
06-22-07, 07:01 AM
Please Ask, Do Tell
by Catherine Moy (more by this author)
Posted 06/22/2007 ET

Democrats and their allies have a new symbol in their battle against America’s war on Muslim Jihadists: the rainbow flag of the gay movement.

The white flag of surrender apparently was not sufficient. So the Democrats have raised the rainbow flag and rolled out an assault on former President Bill Clinton’s “don’t ask, don’t tell” policy for gays in the military.

San Francisco Bay Area Congresswoman Ellen Tauscher, a Democrat, last week announced to eager liberal constituents that she is the new point person to allow gays to serve openly in the military.

Tauscher’s announcement punctuated a coordinated battle by liberals to use gays in the military as a rallying point for their base in the presidential campaign. Its rollout came just as a new exhibit on gays in the military opened in San Francisco, and soon after debates in which a liberal moderator probed GOP and Democrat candidates on the issue.

Even as Tauscher announced her new push for gays in the military, the San Francisco Chronicle printed pictures of three veterans who are on a tour of the states by “veterans who were discharged or chose not to reenlist because of the military’s policy.”

Media are giving the issue plenty of play in conjunction with the Democrats’ shameful campaign. The Advocate, a gay magazine, has a gay Marine staff sergeant in dress blues on its cover for the July 3, 2007, issue.

“Eric Alva's new battle: The gay marine staff sergeant lost a leg fighting one enemy. Now he’s taking on another -- the U.S. military’s antigay policy,” a headline on the Advocate cover states.

The article talks about how Alva lost a leg in Iraq from a landmine, for which he received a Purple Heart and visits from then-Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld, President Bush and First Lady Laura Bush. Later, Alva announced he was gay on Good Morning America.

Reviving this issue during wartime is more evidence that the Democrats see the war as a political toy and not the critical defensive battle of our time. Tauscher is wrongly spinning it as an issue of defense.

“We want this to be a very broad coalition, if we can stay on the fact that this is about military readiness and equality . . .,” Tauscher said in the San Francisco Chronicle.

The first public signs that the Democrats would resuscitate the divisive issue was during televised New Hampshire debates in which the moderator asked GOP candidates whether “don’t ask, don’t tell” should end. The candidates said “no” Democrats disagreed during their debate, a sign that gay rights could serve as a wedge issue for Democrat primary voters who are now shepherded by leftist bloggers. Perhaps they could use the issue to bludgeon Republicans for their failure to see “don’t ask, don’t tell” as a military readiness issue.

Tauscher, who chairs a subcommittee of the House Armed Services Committee, wants to hold hearings on “don’t ask, don’t tell,” and is searching for a Senator to sponsor the legislation. The bill, which Democrats slyly named “the Military Readiness Enhancement Act,” faces serious opposition. Even Tauscher admitted that she doesn’t have the votes to allow gays to serve openly in the military.

Former President Bill Clinton is one of the slickest politicians of modern history, yet he couldn’t solidify support for gay enlistment. And we weren’t in the middle of full-out war with radical Islamic Jihadists.

But the left will continue to drag the military through the mud on this, because they believe it’s a winner with their liberal voters. They can’t see that the issue is, at the very least, a dangerous distraction as the United States fights a lethal and determined enemy.

It is shameful for politicians to amplify the issue for political gain during wartime. Now is not the time for our warriors to sit through hearings on whether gays can openly serve the military without hurting this country’s defense. Our commanders have more important things to do, such as fight a war.

Imagine Gen. George Patton stopping on the battlefield so he could contemplate the intricacies of openly gay warriors under his command. That is what Tauscher is asking our generals to do.

Gays already serve in the military and aren’t discharged unless they openly parade their sexuality. Even then, commanders may ignore the facts. I know of a captain in the Air Force who told his commander he is gay, then ran pornographic pictures of himself on a gay website where he trolled for lovers. The captain also published pictures of himself in an Air Force flight suit on the gay site. The captain was allowed to complete his duty and retire with full military benefits. This happened at Travis Air Force Base, which is part of Tauscher’s district.

Clinton concocted the existing policy as a compromise after he promised during his campaign to allow gays to serve. Gay advocates argue that the military is dismissing troops who are needed in the war on terror. They also point to a Zogby poll taken last year that shows that 73% of troops are OK serving besides gays.

Advocates also argue that that Britain and Israel allow gays to openly serve. Just because our friends do it doesn’t mean we have to. Besides, the last time I checked we were the only Super Power left in the world and that isn’t because we follow our friends’ lead.
The bottom line is that wartime is the wrong time to play politics with gays in the military. Tauscher must lower the rainbow flag and put it away with the Democrats’ white flag.

Ellie