PDA

View Full Version : Do we really need a Gen. Pelosi?



thedrifter
03-12-07, 09:41 AM
Do we really need a Gen. Pelosi?
Congress can cut funding for Iraq, but it shouldn't micromanage the war.
March 12, 2007

AFTER WEEKS OF internal strife, House Democrats have brought forth their proposal for forcing President Bush to withdraw U.S. troops from Iraq by 2008. The plan is an unruly mess: bad public policy, bad precedent and bad politics. If the legislation passes, Bush says he'll veto it, as well he should.

It was one thing for the House to pass a nonbinding vote of disapproval. It's quite another for it to set out a detailed timetable with specific benchmarks and conditions for the continuation of the conflict. Imagine if Dwight Eisenhower had been forced to adhere to a congressional war plan in scheduling the Normandy landings or if, in 1863, President Lincoln had been forced by Congress to conclude the Civil War the following year. This is the worst kind of congressional meddling in military strategy.

This is not to say that Congress has no constitutional leverage — only that it should exercise it responsibly. In a sense, both Bush and the more ardent opponents of the war are right. If a majority in Congress truly believes that the war is not in the national interest, then lawmakers should have the courage of their convictions and vote to stop funding U.S. involvement. They could cut the final checks in six months or so to give Bush time to manage the withdrawal. Or lawmakers could, as some Senate Democrats are proposing, revoke the authority that Congress gave Bush in 2002 to use force against Iraq.

But if Congress accepts Bush's argument that there is still hope, however faint, that the U.S. military can be effective in quelling the sectarian violence, that U.S. economic aid can yet bring about an improvement in Iraqi lives that won't be bombed away and that American diplomatic power can be harnessed to pressure Shiites and Sunnis to make peace — if Congress accepts this, then lawmakers have a duty to let the president try this "surge and leverage" strategy.

By interfering with the discretion of the commander in chief and military leaders in order to fulfill domestic political needs, Congress undermines whatever prospects remain of a successful outcome. It's absurd for House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-San Francisco) to try to micromanage the conflict, and the evolution of Iraqi society, with arbitrary timetables and benchmarks.

Congress should not hinder Bush's ability to seek the best possible endgame to this very bad war. The president needs the leeway to threaten, or negotiate with, Sunnis and Shiites and Kurds, Syrians and Iranians and Turks. Congress can find many ways to express its view that U.S. involvement, certainly at this level, must not go on indefinitely, but it must not limit the president's ability to maneuver at this critical juncture.

Bush's wartime leadership does not inspire much confidence. But he has made adjustments to his team, and there's little doubt that a few hundred legislators do not a capable commander in chief make. These aren't partisan judgments — we also condemned Republican efforts to micromanage President Clinton's conduct of military operations in the Balkans.

Members of Congress need to act responsibly, debating the essence of the choice the United States now faces — to stay or go — and putting their money where their mouths are. But too many lives are at stake to allow members of Congress to play the role of Eisenhower or Lincoln.

Ellie

rockyusmc
03-12-07, 10:39 AM
her problem is she thinks she knows how to run awar and acountry.she comes from a wealthy political family.she says one thing and does another.look at her demand for alarger plane to fly her and her family around.she uses non union help in all her familys business's.her only agenda is to hate the president and v,president.if she ran the war she would make nam look like a kids birthday party.she and her lap dog murtha should go and hide their faces,so we wouldnt have to see their smirks.

HOLM
03-12-07, 07:10 PM
But if Congress accepts Bush's argument that there is still hope, however faint

Congress should not hinder Bush's ability to seek the best possible endgame to this very bad war

When somebody as weak willed as somebody that could make these statements... (I mean grow some balls already).... Can still have enough common sense to see how treasonous the Demoncrats are being....

I know I am a little rough around the edges... But come on... just say it... the damn lib's are our enemies best friend right now.... In all the other wars we rounded up the internal enemies and threw em in the slammer... They forgot to mention that part when talking about Abe, Ike, or even FDR....

I guess some one needs to be there to pander to the majority of Americans that have had their will to fight, or even live, just sucked out of them...

But I say we need to tell it like it is more often and a lot louder!!!!:iwo:

Lets take out the enemy within... :flag:

bootlace15
03-13-07, 11:33 AM
Please leave Nancy and Johnny alone. The more air time they get the more stupid crap they come up with. Just vote all the bums out in 08..........

bootlace15 out

rockyusmc
03-13-07, 05:32 PM
hey boot, maybe we can them and theyll quit LMAO maybe wishes can make it so.see you in dc mar17

drumcorpssnare
03-14-07, 03:51 PM
Pelosi probably can't even install a tampon without stickin' it in her a$$, and she wants to try to manage a 21st century war???

:banana:


drumcorpssnare:usmc: