PDA

View Full Version : The Dems And Media Would Be Gone



jinelson
02-26-07, 09:29 PM
Its a damn shame that this act was repealed in 1921 because all the lib scum operatives of the enemy would be in prison today. Wow it could even mean a fair and unbiased media by law! A very interesting law that was enacted because of the democrats traitorous acts way back in WWI. The only thing thats changed since then is we no longer have this law to protect the nation and put the pukes where they belong. Gee I wonder which party was responsible for getting it repealed?

Jim

16 May, 1918
The U.S. Sedition Act

United States, Statutes at Large, Washington, D.C., 1918, Vol. XL, pp 553 ff.
A portion of the amendment to Section 3 of the Espionage Act of June 15, 1917.
The act was subsequently repealed in 1921.

SECTION 3. Whoever, when the United States is at war, shall willfully make or convey false reports or false statements with intent to interfere with the operation or success of the military or naval forces of the United States, or to promote the success of its enemies, or shall willfully make or convey false reports, or false statements, . . . or incite insubordination, disloyalty, mutiny, or refusal of duty, in the military or naval forces of the United States, or shall willfully obstruct . . . the recruiting or enlistment service of the United States, or . . . shall willfully utter, print, write, or publish any disloyal, profane, scurrilous, or abusive language about the form of government of the United States, or the Constitution of the United States, or the military or naval forces of the United States . . . or shall willfully display the flag of any foreign enemy, or shall willfully . . . urge, incite, or advocate any curtailment of production . . . or advocate, teach, defend, or suggest the doing of any of the acts or things in this section enumerated and whoever shall by word or act support or favor the cause of any country with which the United States is at war or by word or act oppose the cause of the United States therein, shall be punished by a fine of not more than $10,000 or imprisonment for not more than twenty years, or both.

Stephanie Hicks
02-26-07, 10:48 PM
Excellant point! Its a shame that most people will never even hear about this law - which should be in effect right now! You can't, however, expect these liberal bastards to shut up. They're so immoral, twisted, & just plain stupid, that running their mouths & whining is all they know how to do & they're not even good at that!

hmckinley
02-27-07, 04:38 AM
Probably wouldn't have a liberal today, for over the years their gene pool would have been disorganized a little. The liberal's that would remain, flying around out there with their little left wing, but damn sure keeping their pie hole's shut.

ridingcrops
02-27-07, 09:40 AM
I like the part about being dislaoyal and making statements about the Constitution.
That would mean the deserting coward in the White House would be put out today. Since he made the statement to his cabinet to stop throwing the Constitutio in his face any time he broke the law, "It's just a G** D*** piece of paper."
Seems right for him to think of the Constitution like that since he is breaking the law everyday. No, treason isn't just a party thing it crosses all lines.

David Jameson
02-27-07, 09:54 AM
Another one of our brothers of mainstream thought. NOT

OLE SARG
02-27-07, 10:09 AM
*******, there goes crop again on one of his "hate Bush" rants!!!

Speaking of media, has anyone seen much about the piece of vermon former head of Virginia aclu Charles Tierney, age 51. He was arrested by the FBI for possessing child porn - THAT OUGHT TO MAKE THE aclu PROUD!!!!!!!!!!! The piece of **** needs to be strung up by his gonads and left as food for the animals, who are hungary this time of year!!!!!!!!!!!! What a piece of whale****!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I am sure our leftwing press will cover this story with a lot of BS and vigor - MY ASS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

SEMPER FI,

jinelson
02-27-07, 10:25 AM
Bill O'Rielly did a story on just that last night. All the lib media either totally ignored the story or buried it in the print media.

Jim

lilspitfire66
02-27-07, 10:34 AM
It's nice to hear some refreshing talk about politics here.

The main reason why alot of Americans (liberally minded) do not know much about this or the rights in the Constitution is probably because it's not taught so much these days in the classroom, in case it is inflamatory to the ethnic minorities.

Sorry, but that's my assessment here.

Your Constitution was basically ratified so as no foreign power could govern your country @ the time of it's Independence ~ meaning Britain. And that you should take up arms to protect your borders. So I guess you could say that by going out to Iraq and Afghanistan it's protecting your borders against terrorists.

If the Democrats have their way, they'd pull out all of the US troops from Iraq without realising the consequences of their actions. Which is a big mistake because all that would do is make the situation out there far worse than it is now. It would implode.

Sometimes it takes someone to have the guts to stand up for what they feel is the right thing to do. And if you want to have the luxury of being free and independent and having all the liberties that go with it, you have to fight for them even if it means that lives will be sacrificed for those values.

The media tends to give you the information that they want you to hear or see, which is basically the bad stuff that goes on. So whenever anything good comes out of Iraq it's not shown. You just have to weigh up your options as to what's being said and come to your own assumptions on what is really going on out there.

Sgt Leprechaun
02-28-07, 06:07 AM
Hey, but the media is 'mainstream' and doesn't have ANY political agenda whatsoever.

Everyone who believes that, do a handstand NOW, to show your support.