PDA

View Full Version : Cheney Says Opponents Won't Stop New Strategy in Iraq (Update1)



thedrifter
01-14-07, 02:07 PM
Cheney Says Opponents Won't Stop New Strategy in Iraq (Update1)

By Jon Steinman and Nadine Elsibai

Jan. 14 (Bloomberg) -- Vice President Dick Cheney said mounting congressional opposition to the war in Iraq won't stop the administration from deploying more U.S. troops to bring sectarian violence under control.

Cheney said critics, particularly Democrats in Congress who've called for the U.S. to begin withdrawing from Iraq, are validating the view of terrorist leader Osama bin Laden that America ``doesn't have the stomach'' for a drawn-out conflict.

``Iraq is the current, central battlefield'' in the war against terrorists, Cheney said on the ``Fox News Sunday'' program, repeating the stance he and President George W. Bush have held since the start of the conflict almost four years ago. The U.S. ``cannot run a war by committee,'' Cheney said.

Cheney's appearance was part of an administration effort to halt the slide in support for the war and to buy time for the strategy Bush announced Jan. 10, which includes adding 21,500 soldiers and Marines to the 132,000 U.S. military personnel already in the country. Some of their Republican allies in Congress, such as Senators Norm Coleman of Minnesota and Sam Brownback of Kansas, have joined with Democrats in opposition to the increase.

The vice president, who in May 2005 argued that the insurgency in Iraq was in its ``last throes,'' said the administration won't back down. Any non-binding resolution passed by Congress ``would not affect the president's ability to carry out his policy,'' he said today.

`We're Going Forward'

The remarks echoed those Bush made in a recorded interview with CBS's ``60 Minutes'' program, scheduled for broadcast tonight. The president said he will send the extra troops regardless of whether Congress tries to block him.

``I made my decision, we're going forward,'' Bush said, according to excerpts of the interview released by CBS.

In a separate appearance on ABC's ``This Week'' program, National Security Adviser Stephen Hadley said administration officials expect that after a series of hearings in Congress lawmakers will back the new strategy.

``We will be able to persuade the Congress that this is the only option for success in Iraq,'' Hadley said.

Democratic Representative John Murtha of Pennsylvania, who plans to propose legislation to cut off funding for increasing U.S. troop strength in Iraq, said the administration is forcing Congress to act by ignoring public opposition to the war.

Public Sentiment

``You don't like to micromanage the Defense Department, but we have to, in this case, because they're not paying attention to the public,'' Murtha said on the ABC program.

Lawmakers of both parties will vote for ``very strict guidelines'' for the department without cutting money to pay for the troops already there, Murtha said.

Republican Senator John McCain of Arizona, who has criticized Bush for not sending more troops to Iraq at the start, said the administration and the military need to move faster to get the extra soldiers and Marines into Iraq.

``We're done with half-measures and this is the last chance, I think everyone recognizes that,'' he said on the CBS program ``Face the Nation.''

McCain, who is exploring a run for president in 2008, said that while the extra troops won't guarantee success, failure in Iraq would be a ``catastrophe.''

`Continue the Course'

Senator Barack Obama, an Illinois Democrat who also is considering a bid for president, said that catastrophe already has descended on Iraq, and the solution will come from a political settlement and diplomacy, not military force.

``There's certainly no more risks than the approach that is being pursued by the administration and Senator McCain, which suggests that we can simply continue the course that we've been on for the last several years,'' Obama said on the CBS program. ``That's resulted in over 3,000 Americans dying and us spending over $400 billion with no end in sight.''

Bush's plan also includes demands on the government of Iraqi Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki to enact a law making sure oil revenue is distributed equally, to allow the military to disarm sectarian militias and make good on promises to train more Iraqi forces.

Cheney refused to say what the U.S. would do if those benchmarks aren't met. ``We're focused on making this plan work,'' he said.

Hadley said the U.S. isn't trying to replace Maliki because he ``is who the Iraqis have put forward to represent their nation'' in a democratic election.

Iraqi View

Iraqi Foreign Minister Hoshyar Zebari, appearing on CNN's ``Late Edition'' program, said the extra troops are needed to bring stability to violence-plagued Baghdad.

``It has to be supported by others,'' Zebari said. ``But this new strategy is firmer, is different from previous ones. It will involve the Iraqi government also to rise up to its challenges, not to shy away from its responsibility.''

``We are prepared and ready to do that,'' he added.

In presenting his new strategy, Bush has acknowledged that the U.S. made fundamental errors in Iraq, including not having enough troops in the country as sectarian violence expanded after the bombing of a Shiite Muslim shrine in Samarra. In the ``60 Minutes'' interview, the president admitted that the country is more unstable now than it was under the late dictator Saddam Hussein.

``No question, decisions have made things unstable,'' Bush said. ``I think history is going to look back and see a lot of ways we could have done things better. No question about it.''

Cheney repeated the warning to Iran that Bush issued in his speech last week. The U.S. will also do what it must to prevent Iran from threatening Iraq's stability, Cheney said.

Iran ``is fishing in troubled waters, if you will, inside Iraq,'' he said. The Islamic Republic ``is a problem in a much larger sense'' in the region and for U.S. allies such as Saudi Arabia, Israel and Jordan, Cheney said. ``The threat is growing, it is multidimensional.''

To contact the reporter on this story: Jon Steinman in Washington at jsteinman@bloomberg.net ; Nadine Elsibai in Washington at +_ nelsibai@bloomberg.net
Last Updated: January 14, 2007 13:34 EST

Ellie

thedrifter
01-14-07, 05:10 PM
Bush, Cheney say opposition won’t halt troop buildup

The Associated Press
Posted : Sunday Jan 14, 2007 17:31:39 EST

WASHINGTON — Digging in for confrontation, President Bush and Vice President Dick Cheney said they will not budge from sending thousands more U.S. troops to Iraq no matter how much Congress opposes it.

“I fully understand they could try to stop me,” Bush said of new Democratic-run Congress. “But I’ve made my decision. And we’re going forward.”

A defiant Cheney said Sunday that majority Democrats have offered no credible alternative to Bush’s revised war strategy. Cheney said withdrawing from Iraq would mean giving in to al-Qaida leader Osama bin Laden and other U.S. enemies.

“They’re convinced that the United States will, in fact, pack it in and go home if they just kill enough of us,” Cheney said. “They can’t beat us in a standup fight, but they think they can break our will.”

The aggressive White House reaction comes as both the House and Senate prepare to vote on resolutions that oppose additional U.S. troops in Iraq. Cheney said those nonbinding votes by Congress would not affect Bush’s ability to act as he sees fit.

“You cannot run a war by committee,” the vice president said.

Those pos-telection promises of bipartisanship seem quite distant today.

The White House, also seeing some GOP support peal away for the war plan, went all-out to regain some footing. Bush gave his first interview from Camp David, airing Sunday night on CBS’ “60 Minutes,” while Cheney and national security adviser Stephen Hadley made the rounds of the morning talk shows.

Lawmakers hardened their stance, too, pledging to explore all ways possible to stop Bush.

Beyond the promised votes in opposition to the president’s approach, the Democratic leadership is considering whether, and how, to cut off funding for additional troops.

“You don’t like to micromanage the Defense Department, but we have to, in this case, because they’re not paying attention to the public,” said Rep. John Murtha, a Pennsylvania Democrat who helps oversee military funding.

“We need to look at what options we have available to constrain the president,” said Democratic Sen. Barack Obama of Illinois, a possible White House candidate in 2008. Democrats are wary, though, of appearing to undermine the troops that are already in Iraq.

It is unclear how any effort by Congress would affect Bush’s plan to send more troops to Iraq. Hadley said the White House already has money appropriated by Congress to move the additional forces to Iraq “and the president will be doing that.”

GOP Sen. John McCain of Arizona, a potential 2008 presidential contender who endorses Bush’s call for more troops, said votes to express disapproval were pointless. “If they’re dead serious,” he said of those fighting Bush’s strategy, “then we should have a motion to cut off funding.”

The Bush administration had hoped that the president’s overhauled strategy would lead to some bipartisan unity. Or, in the least, that it would get an extended hearing and debate before legislative leaders made up their minds.

Instead, the White House encountered a Congress — and a public — that vastly rejected the military and political ideas he announced last week in a nationally televised address.

Most Americans oppose sending more troops to Iraq. The war was the dominant issue in the November election, in which Republicans lost control of the House and Senate.

“It’s a complete absurdity to be pursuing the notion that somehow troops are going to resolve the security issue,” said Sen. John Kerry, D-Mass.

When asked if the White House was ignoring the will of the American people, Cheney said no president worth his salt would make big decisions based on polls. “You cannot simply stick your finger up in the wind and say, ‘Gee, public opinion’s against; we’d better quit.”

Bush announced last week he will send 21,500 more troops to Iraq to halt violence, mainly around Baghdad, as an essential step toward stabilizing the country’s government.

That plan and economic and political steps are meant to allow Iraqis to move ahead with securing the country themselves and allow U.S. troops to return home gradually.

Kerry and other Democrats say they want to start a phased withdrawal of troops, along with stepped-up diplomacy with Iraq’s neighbors, to speed up the transfer of responsibility to Iraqis.

Like Bush, Cheney braced Americans to frame the war in Iraq as part of a much longer effort.

“It is the kind of conflict that’s going to drive our policy and our government for the next 20 or 30 or 40 years. We have to prevail and we have to have the stomach for the fight long term,” he said.

Defense Secretary Robert Gates, meanwhile, arrived in London for talks Sunday with Prime Minister Tony Blair on Iraq.

Hadley was interviewed on “This Week” on ABC and “Meet the Press” on NBC. Cheney was on “Fox News Sunday.” McCain and Obama were on CBS’ “Face the Nation.” Kerry was on CNN’s “Late Edition.”

Ellie

thedrifter
01-15-07, 06:37 AM
Bush insists Congress can't halt Iraq buildup <br />
<br />
Amid growing criticism, the president and Cheney seek to reassert the strategy of additional troops. <br />
By Nicole Gaouette, Times Staff Writer <br />
January...