PDA

View Full Version : Army sloppy in keeping track of parts, tools, watchdog says



thedrifter
12-29-05, 08:21 AM
Army sloppy in keeping track of parts, tools, watchdog says
By: ELISABETH GOODRIDGE - Associated Press

WASHINGTON -- The Army can't account for $68 million in parts and tools shipped to contractors for repairs in 2004 because it doesn't demand receipts, congressional auditors said Wednesday.

"Although the (Defense Department) policy requires the military services to confirm receipt of all assets shipped to contractors, the Army is not consistently recording shipment receipts in its inventory management systems," the Government Accountability Office said in a 34-page report.

In earlier audits, the GAO found a similar lack of basic accounting oversight with Navy and Air Force parts and tool shipments.

Each year, the Army ships thousands of items, ranging from small tools to turbine engines, to private contractors for repair, alterations or modifications. Looking at data from two inventory control points, the GAO investigators said 15 percent -- or $68 million -- of the unclassified shipments they analyzed "could not be confirmed as being received."

The GAO said another $481.7 million in unclassified items shipped for repair -- about 42 percent -- couldn't be reconciled with shipping records. Discrepancies also were found in records for 37 percent, or about $8.1 million shipments, of classified parts and tools.

"These data show that the Army, on the basis of records receipts maintained in its inventory management systems, cannot confirm that a substantial portion of its inventory items shipped to repair contracts were in fact received," the audit said.

The GAO said the head of the Army's Material Command should look at providing contractors advance notice of shipments, require quarterly status reports and better document contractors' receipt of shipments.

Jack Bell, the deputy under secretary of defense for logistics and materiel readiness, agreed with the GAO recommendations in a Nov. 29 letter responding to a draft of the report. The Army had no immediate response Wednesday to the final report.

On the Net:

The Government Accountability Office: www.gao.gov/

Ellie

Nagalfar
12-29-05, 12:08 PM
What isnt the Army sloppy in? from uniforms to training.. anyone?

garryh123
12-29-05, 01:22 PM
They seem to be really good at being sloppy! :banana:

yellowwing
12-29-05, 01:47 PM
I am a real believer in the FedEx logistics systems. I can get packages picked up by 1700 and it will be delivered by 1000 anywhere in the US or Canada.

Why doesn't the Pentagon use a similar model? Even if they purchased the logistics model from FedEx, it would pay for itself within months.

hrscowboy
12-29-05, 03:22 PM
My 2 cents on this: Disband the army and let the Marine Corps handle everything................ orrahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh

sgt.lane
12-29-05, 04:56 PM
Sounds like someone needs the Marine Corps Integrated Maintenenace Management System!!!!1 LOL (sorry, was a secondary MOS)

lovdog
12-30-05, 12:11 PM
With the advent of the computer nowadays you would think that it would be an easy task to track anything!!Unless the ones "making the deal" don't want it that way!! Sounds like this may be the case - as long as there is no paper trail, you let yourself in for all sorts of problems!! But, paying for something that there isn't even an invoice listed - well that smells like the "dead skunk in the middle of the road"!! Like always, this too will be swept under the rug of government red tape & lies. Give me about 3 or 4 Marines on this Website & access to contractors' & suppliers records & a good secretary, and I bet we could find out where the "missing supplies" went to and who is responsible!!
Of course, Marines have always been able to "make do" with what we have - if we don't have it - then we had to steal it!! Right?? Wrong!! We "borrowed" things!! Marines always "borrow"!!!
Like at Danang - 68, tow motor was down for moving planes around. Did we lay down & fret - no way, we borrowed one from the Air Force side. They had more than they needed anyway. Now, they did get a little upset because we painted it "our colors" but it was because we were patriotic and liked green. We even left the serial # on the unit so it could be identified when they found out who borrowed it. Of course, being good Marines, we had no idea that this was not ours to use - since the military is one big happy family anyway. And when a Air Force Major showed up at our doorstep - all of us had no idea of how the tow motor even got there!!(Marines stick together)!!
Marines are experts in "playing dumb". I think we invented this concept.
Maybe - and this is just a thought, that the missing Army items have just been "borrowed by" - Uncle Sams Misguided Children!!

Anyway, to those soldiers of the U.S. Army, Airman, Navy and Coast Guard personnel, we did and still do appreciate you letting us Marines "borrow" the military items to continue to fight the "good fight" against all of our former and current enemies. At least you know that we always had good intentions on using that equipment to do our best to defeat the enemy because you would have just let it sit and rust away!!!

Come to think of it, I can't remember one time that anything was ever stolen from us!!

yellowwing
12-30-05, 12:27 PM
Anyway, to those soldiers of the U.S. Army, Airman, Navy and Coast Guard personnel, we did and still do appreciate you letting us Marines "borrow"
And we have paid them back a hundred fold when we picked up their Pilot Scott O'Grady, or when we rescued those Army guys that were left out in the desert forgotten by their unit.

And that's just recently. Who can count all the times before where Marines have saved their bacon.