PDA

View Full Version : Okinawa Governor Opposes U.S. Base Plan



thedrifter
10-31-05, 06:51 AM
Okinawa Governor Opposes U.S. Base Plan
By MARI YAMAGUCHI, Associated Press Writer1 hour, 53 minutes ago

Okinawa's governor told Japan's central government on Monday that a plan to build a U.S. heliport on the southern island as part of a realignment of the American military presence there was unacceptable.

The heliport plan was part of a deal struck over the weekend to close the unpopular Futenma Marine Corps Air Station on Okinawa and move its functions to another base on the island.

The plan "completely disagrees with the prefecture's ideas. It is absolutely not acceptable to Okinawa," Gov. Keiichi Inamine told reporters after meeting with Defense Facilities Administration Agency chief Iwao Kitahara.

Japan and the United States reached a broad agreement on strengthening military cooperation, reducing the number of U.S. Marines in Okinawa and giving Tokyo greater responsibility for security in the Pacific.

Under the accord, 7,000 U.S. Marines will leave strategically located Okinawa for the U.S. Pacific territory of Guam, a move that is expected to take six years. Japan will work with the U.S. government to examine how it can help facilitate the move to Guam.

There are currently 14,460 Marines in Japan, the largest Marine contingent based overseas. Nearly all are located on Okinawa, where residents have expressed a strong desire for a rapid reduction in U.S. forces.

Inamine welcomed the cut in troop numbers, but balked at the plan to relocate the Futenma base in the crowded southern part of Okinawa to Camp Schwab in the north. He said many Okinawans want Futenma to be removed altogether because of safety and environmental concerns. Many Okinawans oppose any new U.S. military construction on the island.

"We do not believe the latest relocation plan can effectively resolve the issue," Inamine said.

An official from the Defense Facilities Administration Agency quoted Kitahara as saying earlier Monday that "very difficult opinions and suggestions" had been received.

"We'll continue our effort to show sincerity and gain understanding," the official said on condition of anonymity in accordance with agency rules.

The central government — which is sensitive to the concerns of Okinawans following a series of high-profile accidents and crimes linked to U.S. forces based on the island — has the final say on the proposed move.

"We have to consider how we can achieve national security for all of Japan while paying consideration to the local residents' difficulties," newly appointed defense chief Fukushiro Nukaga told reporters.

Okinawa, Japan's southernmost island state about 1,000 miles southwest of Tokyo, shoulders nearly half of about 50,000 U.S. servicemen in Japan.

On Sunday, thousands of activists staged a rally on Okinawa to protest crimes, noise and pollution long associated with the Marine bases, and to demand that more U.S. troops be removed than the 7,000 Marines envisioned in the plan.

Ellie

kentmitchell
10-31-05, 04:02 PM
Hmmm. I was at Futenma briefly in '57. It was built by the army. Nice barracks with company messhalls. Best living quarters we had in the Far East. Mostly we lived in quonset huts or tents. In Japan at Camp Fuji, the buildings housed American POWs before we won the war and moved in.
I promise you, those 7,000 won't like Guam. All kinds of snakes over there, hot as hell and the natives ain't friendly.

dcline
10-31-05, 08:20 PM
When you attack a country and lose, and that country provides your security per your unconditional surrender, you don't have a choice as to what they do. It is the good will and hope for a stronger future that the US has always reasoned with are former enemys and come to a agreeable solution in the best interests of all parties. Japan would never consider giving us a choice, they would just do as they wished. If they had defeated us, we would have to conform to their ways and we would not have a choice as to where a base is, was, or is going to be located. Japan doesn't have the right to demand anything. Japan lost a fight that it started just because it's been 50 years, doesn't change anything. We have given Japans people their freedom and control of their government. We are moving a base to apease them but thats just not good enough. I say tough SH*T this will cost us millions and give back land badly needed for housing, cut down on noise, and develop land that is not adequate for housing(ie to far from Naha or Okinawa city.)and yet they still complain. What's that saying Don't look a gift horse in the mouth.

hrscowboy
10-31-05, 08:57 PM
Buttom line it was a mistake to give oki back to japan thats the bottom line.

greensideout
10-31-05, 09:42 PM
Buttom line it was a mistake to give oki back to japan thats the bottom line.


The fact is, Japan invaided Okinawa and we rescued the island in WW-II and gave it back to the Ryukyuans, the native people. Then we gave it to Japan? One, we didn't own it and two, neither did the Japs! Japan had been on the island for less then 50 years before they started the war with America.

Ed Palmer
11-01-05, 07:09 AM
Thats ok move all U.S.Forces out of Okinawa and give them 30 days to make up the monatary loss in their ***** houses and bars, also all of their people that work on bases as maids and house boys. and listen to them scream that we owe them money for moving out so quickly.
That would be one hell of a chunk of money out of their pockets.So yes let U.S. move out and bankrupt them and listen to them cry.