PDA

View Full Version : The New Veterans



thedrifter
11-12-04, 07:23 AM
Oliver North: The New Veterans

November 11, 2004

Washington, D.C. - On Thursday, the calendar reminded us that it was Veterans Day. But few Americans paused to honor those who have served in our Armed Forces. Ceremonies were held at veteran's cemeteries, but there were few parades. The veteran's hospital I called on this week didn't record any perceptible increase in visitors. Perhaps that's because so few of us know much about the history of the wars we have had to fight to stay free.

When I speak to high school or college students, steeped in a culture of instant gratification, most are surprised to learn that America's wars have usually been long, bloody affairs - not quick victories. Few of them know, for example, that for the first six months of World War II, America lost every significant engagement; that it was not until Midway in June, 1942, that we won our first major battle. Nor are they aware that it wasn't until August, nine months after Pearl Harbor, with the Marine landings on Guadalcanal, that we were finally able to go on the offensive.

During that terrible time, when victory was anything but certain, Americans learned about wartime events on the radio, in hometown newspapers and through "newsreels" at local theaters. But now, thanks to tiny video cameras, lightweight global television uplinks and satellite phones, Americans watch wars as they happen - like an NFL game - play by play.

Today, war is broadcast into our homes with "color commentary" by Armchair Admirals and Broadcast Brigadiers. Many of these Sound-Bite Special Forces critique the commanders in the field and the troops on the ground as they purport to analyze major plays and minor skirmishes. Chester Nimitz, Archer Vandegrift and Dwight Eisenhower were fortunate to have fought their war without the "benefit" of such help.

Unfortunately, today's adversaries avail themselves of this "coverage" - and frequently use the medium against us. This week, U.S. troops in Fallujah found televisions and satellite dishes tuned to a U.S. cable news network and computers linked to the web pages of American newspapers. In the slaughterhouses where kidnap victims were tortured and beheaded, video cameras, tapes and DVDs of the atrocities were confiscated. The Al Aksa Martyrs Brigade - a creation of the much mourned Yassir Arafat - perfected the art of videotaping suicide terrorists. And in Iraq, IEDs are emplaced with cameras pointed at them so that Al Jazeera can broadcast their deadly detonations and exhort others to Jihad.

Interestingly, now that U.S. and Iraqi government forces are in the terrorists' lair and the radicals are on the run, Al Jazeera has been reduced to pirating American TV images. Apparently the terrorists that the Al Jazeera cameramen have been living among don't want to be videotaped dressed in women's clothing while they flee like cowards from allied troops.

That's not all that the so-called Arab press isn't covering. The same outlets that gleefully showed Musab al-Zarqawi's thugs firing AK-47s, RPGs and mortars at U.S. and Iraqi troops, somehow missed Interim Prime Minister Ayad Allawi - not an American - ordering the restoration of law and order in Fallujah. Hardly mentioned was his appeal for dialogue before the operation or the Iraqi government's humanitarian call for civilians to vacate the city before military action commenced.

Al Jazeera, Al Arabiya and the other major mid-east outlets have all but ignored the success of the Iraqi forces engaged in this operation. Miles of combat footage has aired showing U.S. Marines and soldiers, their LAVs, AAVs, M-1 tanks, Armored Humvees, Strykers, and Bradley fighting vehicles - but scant coverage has been given to the nearly 4,000 Iraqi National Guardsmen fighting beside 11,000 Americans.

Prior to the operation, interim Iraqi Defense Minister Hazim Shalan told his soldiers, "Your conscience and families call for you. They call for you to liberate this city." A 28-year-old Iraqi National Guardsman said, "We are here to defend our country. The world looks down on Iraq now because of the terrorists who are not Iraqi. We will make them see Iraqi men ending the terrorism." And that's what they are doing, though few in the Arab world are seeing it.

One of the first objectives inside Fallujah was the city hospital - a terrorist strong-point. It was quickly captured by U.S. and Iraqi Special Forces. As soon as it was secured, American and Iraqi doctors and nurses re-opened it to treat the civilian population. The two major bridges spanning the Euphrates were taken undamaged, opening supply routes for food and medicine into the city. When fire was received from the green-domed Muhammadia Mosque that the terrorists were using as a command center, Iraqi troops occupied it.

Instead of giving these events the coverage they deserved - and the Iraqi troops the credit they earned, the international media laments the "unilateral action" by U.S. troops and a "needless loss of innocent life." Rather than praise the Iraqis for fighting back against the terrorist menace that threatens their homeland, U.N. Secretary General Kofi Annan chose to issue a statement warning that, "The use of force could destabilize the country at a critical point in the preparation for elections."

Hogwash. Without this intervention it would be impossible to hold elections in January. Fallujah is the beginning of the end for those bent on subverting democracy in Iraq. The slaughterhouses where kidnappers filmed hostage beheadings are closed. The bomb factories are out of business. The terrorists are on the run.

Once again, American soldiers, sailors, airmen and Marines - a new generation of veterans - have stood shoulder-to-shoulder with a brave ally to offer others the hope of freedom. Whether the mainstream U.S. media, the international press or the U.N. acknowledge it or not, the people of Iraq now have a government of, by and for the people within their grasp.


Ellie

wsimkins
11-12-04, 07:37 AM
Go Oli! Well said on his part.

Sgt. Smitty
11-17-04, 11:33 AM
It's not the students fault that they don't know anything, it's the educational system in this country. The history books are full of bull and misrepresentations. They teach nothing about what it was like in war, and what they do teach is most often questionable if not totally wrong. My youngest boy, that graduated last year came up to me when he was still in school and they were studying Vietnam and asked me some questions in regards to his history book. This book was sooooo off the mark that i called the school and wanted to know who the hell wrote this crap and when they were gonna start tellin the truth about what really went on in the Nam. All i got was a "Gee, i don't really know"

Doc Crow
11-17-04, 05:14 PM
Ollie does it again