View Full Version : Once More a Nation Divided

08-17-04, 09:18 AM

Hack's Target

Once More a Nation Divided

By David H. Hackworth

The Vietnam War rages on. Witness the barrages being fired by Viet vets on the right and the left: “George W. Bush is a draft-dodger”; “John F. Kerry isn’t a war hero.”

Once again, that tragic war divides America – and this time around it’s vet pitted against vet.

Sure, Bush dodged the draft, along with a reported 14 million other Americans with the savvy to work out that Vietnam was a no-win, sorry war. But although he had the luck and the connections to land a spot in the Air Guard, he did put his butt on the line flying a machine for which he was entitled to hazardous-duty pay – and that's because zooming around in a jet fighter was and still is highly dangerous.

And sure, Kerry’s campaign push on how he Ramboed his way through the war – for four months – rubs a lot of vets the wrong way. And it does take its toll on those of us who prefer our heroes to be modest, unassuming types like Alvin York – who stayed the course until it was “Over, over there.”

But politics and style aside, Kerry did serve with distinction in Vietnam when he easily could have avoided that killing field. His service to his country shouldn’t be diminished by the same despicable, politically motivated tactics visited upon Sens. John McCain in South Carolina and Max Cleland in Georgia, also Viet vets. This kind of gutter-bashing doesn’t belong in American politics, and vets shouldn’t allow themselves to be used as ammo for cheap shots at one of their own.

The stalwart Brown Water Navy warriors who fought at Kerry’s side say he was A-OK, which is good enough for me. The muckrakers such as John O’Neill and his Swiftboat snipers – who didn’t sail on his boat but served anywhere from 100 meters to 300 miles away – are now coming off like eyewitnesses when in fact not one of their testimonies would hold up in a court of law. A judge would call these men liars and disallow their biased statements.

I’ve been in a fair number of battles in my lifetime, first fighting for my country in several hot wars, then covering a dozen conflicts as a correspondent. And I’ve learned that if you can’t see the fight right up close, smell it, hear it and touch it, you can’t possibly bear witness.

This isn’t the first time Kerry’s been sniped at. Joe Klein wrote in The New Yorker that Nixon aide Charles Colson formed the Vietnam Veterans for a Just Peace in 1971 solely to attack John Kerry.

Colson told Klein that Kerry “was a thorn in our flesh. He was very articulate, a credible leader of the opposition. He forced us to create a counterfoil. We found a vet named John O’Neill and formed a group called Vietnam Veterans for a Just Peace. We had O’Neill meet the president, and we did everything we could do to boost his group.”

O’Neill and his chorus of haters are still in their get-Kerry mode. I suspect the decades-long fury is still fueled by Kerry’s high-profile anti-war stance when he returned home. That was a position that was taken by hundreds of thousands of other Viet vets, including myself in 1971 – which, according to Joe Califono's recent book, Inside: A Public Life, almost cost me my life.

McCain has already asked President Bush to distance himself from this “dishonest and dishonorable” attack. Advice that Bush should take one step further by ordering Vietnam draft-dodger Karl Rove and the rest of the character-assassination squad who zapped McCain and Cleland to back off. And then publicly stand tall and say that this type of behavior insults every vet who’s served America in peace and war.

As our commander in chief, Bush also needs to bear in mind that the U.S. Navy and its high standards for handling awards are now on trial as well. Hopefully, the president’s righteous actions will expedite that institution’s exoneration along with Lt. John Kerry’s heroism.

Hopefully, too, these angry, troubled vets still haunted by the Vietnam War will eventually find closure. But one thing I know for sure – it won’t come from fratricide.

--Eilhys England contributed to this column.

Col. David H. Hackworth (USA Ret.) is SFTT.org co-founder and Senior Military Columnist for DefenseWatch magazine. For information on his many books, go to his home page at Hackworth.com, wehre you can sign in for his free weekly Defending America. Send mail to P.O. Box 11179, Greenwich, CT 06831. His newest book is “Steel My Soldiers’ Hearts.” © 2004 David H. Hackworth. Please send Feedback responses to dwfeedback@yahoo.com.



08-17-04, 02:14 PM
You notice how these mucks always demand that Bush denounce things and Bush should distance himself but when it's the Democrats lying and making false claims about Bush, none of them have a word to utter about Kerry.
Hackworth doesn't have anything negative to say about Kerry's tactics, and the bull**** that goes on at his fund raisers, so he should really just keep his mouth shut!
He's one of those "Military Experts" who was trying to give commentary during the Iraq Invasion.
The dumb ass doesn't even know that John McCain is from Arizona, not South Carolina!

08-17-04, 02:37 PM
Please, he knows where John McCain is from. Perhaps you should recall the 2000 election. McCain was smeared in South Carolina by Bush's boys in the Republican primaries. He was also called out on the Senate floor by a fellow Republican asking him what he knew about sacrifice.

The bottom line for me is that the Republicans are historical revisionists. Serving in Vietnam now seems like a bad thing. John Kerry went, he saw and he didn't like what he saw. It may have been a bad war, but one's service should not be a negative thing!

Also, an incumbent president should be running on his administrations accomplishments - since this group has none, they are focusing on Kerry's shortcomings.

Just name one thing that Bush has accomplished and I will be happy. I ask people this all the time and they can't address it. The tax cut has been a joke. The middle class is squeezed - it was noted the other day that a family with $51,000 in taxable income got a $1000 in tax relief - whereas those making over 200,000 got much more than that - the upper 1% of tax payers saved about $75,000.

Where did the difference go? How about the budget surplus which is no longer a surplus, but a record deficit

08-17-04, 03:02 PM

"The stalwart Brown Water Navy warriors who fought at Kerry’s side say he was A-OK, which is good enough for me. The muckrakers such as John O’Neill and his Swiftboat snipers – who didn’t sail on his boat but served anywhere from 100 meters to 300 miles away – are now coming off like eyewitnesses when in fact not one of their testimonies would hold up in a court of law. "

Hell, the King James Bible and it's testimonies about the life of JEsus Christ would not stand up in a court of law either, but millions of people accept THAT as fact. At least those swift boat "snipers" were near. Not like the people who wrote THAT booke who lived anywhere from 50 -200 years AFTER the fact.

so there is precedence for this kind of acceptance.

( whole thing written to show the absurd notion of mud slinginmg of ANY kind. the people who were there know. That's it. Anyone else has an opinion.)