PDA

View Full Version : Distributed Operations: The Time Is Now


thedrifter
08-03-04, 02:33 PM
Greybeard....I will need your help on this one......or any other wingers........


Distributed Operations: The Time Is Now

by LtGen Edward Hanlon, Jr.

Regardless of current success, the Marine Corps must
continue to develop and test new initiatives.


A few months ago the Marine Corps Combat Development Command began to examine how the capabilities of our forward deployed forces could be improved to meet some of the critical capability gaps of the combatant commanders, particularly gaps in timely, actionable intelligence and the ability to apply tailored combat power immediately, including special operations. We examined both near-term solutions based on existing equipment, organizations, and operating concepts and longer term solutions that would leverage future equipment, such as the Joint Strike Fighter (JSF), MV–22 Osprey, maritime prepositioning force (future) (MPF(F)), and future organizational approaches and operating concepts. The concept of distributed operations that is articulated in the article and vignette that follow is the result of that work.


There are three main reasons why distributed operations is the right initiative at this time in our Corps’ history.


First, despite our unprecedented operational success in Operation IRAQI FREEDOM, current stability and support operations clearly indicate that now is not the time to drop our packs and rest on our well-deserved laurels. Our enemies in the global war on terrorism—al-Qaeda and other organizations like them—are watching, learning, and adapting. They will continue to present us with new threats and challenges, and we’ll need to adapt our methods to successfully deal with them. Moreover, to retain the initiative—not just react—we need to develop and apply new approaches and new tactics, staying a step ahead. Distributed operations will provide a set of new capabilities toward these ends.


Second, we are fast approaching the operational threshold on a number of technologically enabled new capabilities that will dramatically enhance the combat power, speed, and reach of our Operating Forces. Operational maneuver from the sea, ship-to-objective maneuver, and seabasing are well-known concepts that will soon be realized by leveraging the transformational capabilities offered by the MV–22 Osprey, expeditionary fighting vehicle, LCAC, and MPF(F). Yet there are other new developments—the JSF and new over-the-horizon/on-the-move command and control systems, for example—that still need to be fully leveraged by seabased Marine air-ground task forces.


Third, and most importantly, I see in distributed operations the opportunity to realize the full potential of the small unit leader in carrying the Marine Corps’ legacy of innovation forward, especially the noncommissioned officers (NCOs) and junior officers who are leading our infantry units. It’s almost axiomatic that we routinely underestimate what our NCOs are capable of until they prove it time and again in the crucible of combat. Distributed operations will offer them an unprecedented new challenge, and it will similarly challenge the young officers—lieutenants and captains—who are leading them. The development of these leaders is the centerpiece of this initiative.


The article and vignette that follow are points of departure for taking the distributed operations concept forward, developing and refining it, and turning it into real capabilities in the future. We need Marines to engage in a spirited, broadbased debate over these ideas, similar to the debate over maneuver warfare in the 1980s. Along with our formal experimentation program, Marines—at all levels—should take these ideas to the field to test and refine them. Then we must share our experiences with others. In this regard, the Marine Corps Gazette provides a vitally important forum for the exchange of ideas.


Semper Fidelis.

>LtGen Hanlon is the Deputy Commandant, Combat Development.

http://www.mca-marines.org/Gazette/0704hanlon.html


Ellie

thedrifter
08-03-04, 02:34 PM
August 02, 2004

Corps lays out transition pipeline for Osprey crews

By Christian Lowe
Times staff writer


The Marine Corps issued new guidelines July 22 governing the retention and accession of new MV-22 Osprey enlisted aircrew.
The guidance, spelled out in MarAdmin message 315/04, builds on previous changes to the Corps’ promotion system to accommodate the transition of Marines from the CH-46 Sea Knight and CH-53D Sea Stallion communities to new Osprey job fields.

The message formally designates Marine air group personnel support detachments as responsible for making sure their enlisted Marines know how to make the transition to the MV-22 community and complete the administrative work to get them there.

“They know the people in their squadrons,” said Maj. Chris Taylor, a tilt-rotor and rotary wing manpower analyst at Marine headquarters, of the personnel support detachments. “This message really formalizes the process.”

The Corps gradually will increase the number of new Marines it designates for MV-22 jobs as CH-46 squadrons transition to MV-22 squadrons.

The Corps hopes to send new Marines to squadrons undergoing transition training at the Marine Corps Air Station New River, N.C.-based Marine Medium Tiltrotor Training Squadron 204 to “build more cohesive units” starting in 2005.

Once the squadron is fully manned and trained, new Marines will go directly to their Osprey squadron for training, the MarAdmin states.

Promotions to staff noncommissioned officer ranks in the CH-46 and MV-22 fields will be based on seniority and time in grade in both communities, the message said.

Likewise, Marines who wish to re-enlist will compete for boat-spaces available in the combined MV-22, CH-46 and CH-53D job fields, the message states.

The first two CH-46 squadrons will enter transition training at VMMT-204 in 2005, with the first squadron of MV-22s hitting the fleet in 2006.

Christian Lowe covers Marine Corps aviation career issues. He can be reached at (703) 750-8613 or clowe@marinecorpstimes.com.

http://www.marinecorpstimes.com/story.php?f=1-MARINEPAPER-275170.php


Ellie

thedrifter
08-12-04, 01:45 PM
Issue Date: August 09, 2004

New helicopter chokes on its own exhaust
Super Cobra test is stopped when rocket firings endanger drivetrain

By Christian Lowe
Times staff writer


It’s hard to believe that the Corps’ newest attack helicopter could be accused of firing too much ordnance.
But that’s just what happened during testing in late July on a firing range in Arizona.

An AH-1Z Super Cobra was forced to return to base and stop testing July 22 after exhaust from rockets fired from its weapons stations was sucked into the engine’s intake, causing the drivetrain to “over-torque” — a situation that can cause it to snap.

The engineering team halted testing and is trying to determine what went wrong.

It is still unclear what engineers intend to do about the problem. They may need to modify the engine intakes or the rocket pods, or change how the Super Cobras will operate in combat.

But in any case, officials aren’t worried that the situation is a “show stopper.”

“It may be something where we make a minor design change to the aircraft; it may be we operationally change how we employ the weapons. We haven’t had a chance to review all the data yet,” said Robin Locksley, lead flight test engineer for the H-1 upgrade program office at Naval Air Systems Command, Patuxent River, Md.

The Marine Corps plans to upgrade nearly 150 of its AH-1W Super Cobras to the new Z model and nearly 100 UH-1N Hueys to the Y version through 2014.

The older helicopters will be retrofitted with new weapons systems and components that will give both helicopters greater range and payload than their predecessors.

During weapons accuracy tests of the AH-1Z at the Army’s Yuma Proving Ground in Arizona, the H-1 test team fired 2.75-inch rockets at low speed from two 19-shot pods mounted on the helicopter’s stubby wings.

As the rockets “rippled” out of the pods — alternating fire from one pod to the other — engineers noticed fluctuations in the engine power readings that worried them enough to halt testing. The situation required officials to take apart the engine to examine exactly what went wrong and how to fix it, Locksley said.

The rocket exhaust problem follows another incident in February in which engineers scrambled to fix the Super Cobra’s engine exhaust outlets. Engineers realized that hot engine gasses were weakening the metal on the tail boom, so engineers developed a modification to vent the engine exhaust away from the tail.

Not only did the new “ducted exhaust” solve the overheating problem, it also helped reduce the helicopters’ infrared signature, making it less detectable by heat-seeking missiles.

“We had a whole lot of good side effects on that” new exhaust, said Col. Doug Isleib, H-1 upgrade program manager. “Now, we have a real good positive impact on what our IR signature is.”

The ducted exhaust assembly will be flight tested for the AH-1Z this fall and later for the UH-1Y — forcing a possible four-month delay in the operational evaluation testing scheduled to begin for the $875 million program in the spring of 2005, officials said.

Officials don’t expect the missile-exhaust problem to cause the same kind delay as the tail-boom heating problem did, though engineers said they’ll have to come up with a solution soon.

Locksley said the engineers should have the problem resolved in about a month.

“It’s not a big impact,” Locksley said. “It’s just another design evolution we have to go through.”

http://www.marinecorpstimes.com/story.php?f=1-MARINEPAPER-281119.php


Ellie