PDA

View Full Version : Terror in the Skies, Again?



thedrifter
07-15-04, 06:36 PM
Terror in the Skies, Again?

By Annie Jacobsen

A WWS Exclusive Article


Note from the E-ditors: You are about to read an account of what happened during a domestic flight that one of our writers, Annie Jacobsen, took from Detroit to Los Angeles. The WWS Editorial Team debated long and hard about how to handle this information and ultimately we decided it was something that should be shared. What does it have to do with finances? Nothing, and everything. Here is Annie's story.

On June 29, 2004, at 12:28 p.m., I flew on Northwest Airlines flight #327 from Detroit to Los Angeles with my husband and our young son. Also on our flight were 14 Middle Eastern men between the ages of approximately 20 and 50 years old. What I experienced during that flight has caused me to question whether the United States of America can realistically uphold the civil liberties of every individual, even non-citizens, and protect its citizens from terrorist threats.

On that Tuesday, our journey began uneventfully. Starting out that morning in Providence, Rhode Island, we went through security screening, flew to Detroit, and passed the time waiting for our connecting flight to Los Angeles by shopping at the airport stores and eating lunch at an airport diner. With no second security check required in Detroit we headed to our gate and waited for the pre-boarding announcement. Standing near us, also waiting to pre-board, was a group of six Middle Eastern men. They were carrying blue passports with Arabic writing. Two men wore tracksuits with Arabic writing across the back. Two carried musical instrument cases - thin, flat, 18 long. One wore a yellow T-shirt and held a McDonald's bag. And the sixth man had a bad leg -- he wore an orthopedic shoe and limped. When the pre-boarding announcement was made, we handed our tickets to the Northwest Airlines agent, and walked down the jetway with the group of men directly behind us.

My four-year-old son was determined to wheel his carry-on bag himself, so I turned to the men behind me and said, You go ahead, this could be awhile. No, you go ahead, one of the men replied. He smiled pleasantly and extended his arm for me to pass. He was young, maybe late 20's and had a goatee. I thanked him and we boarded the plan.

Once on the plane, we took our seats in coach (seats 17A, 17B and 17C). The man with the yellow shirt and the McDonald's bag sat across the aisle from us (in seat 17E). The pleasant man with the goatee sat a few rows back and across the aisle from us (in seat 21E). The rest of the men were seated throughout the plane, and several made their way to the back.

As we sat waiting for the plane to finish boarding, we noticed another large group of Middle Eastern men boarding. The first man wore a dark suit and sunglasses. He sat in first class in seat 1A, the seat second-closet to the cockpit door. The other seven men walked into the coach cabin. As aware Americans, my husband and I exchanged glances, and then continued to get comfortable. I noticed some of the other passengers paying attention to the situation as well. As boarding continued, we watched as, one by one, most of the Middle Eastern men made eye contact with each other. They continued to look at each other and nod, as if they were all in agreement about something. I could tell that my husband was beginning to feel anxious.

The take-off was uneventful. But once we were in the air and the seatbelt sign was turned off, the unusual activity began. The man in the yellow T-shirt got out of his seat and went to the lavatory at the front of coach -- taking his full McDonald's bag with him. When he came out of the lavatory he still had the McDonald's bag, but it was now almost empty. He walked down the aisle to the back of the plane, still holding the bag. When he passed two of the men sitting mid-cabin, he gave a thumbs-up sign. When he returned to his seat, he no longer had the McDonald's bag.

Then another man from the group stood up and took something from his carry-on in the overhead bin. It was about a foot long and was rolled in cloth. He headed toward the back of the cabin with the object. Five minutes later, several more of the Middle Eastern men began using the forward lavatory consecutively. In the back, several of the men stood up and used the back lavatory consecutively as well.

For the next hour, the men congregated in groups of two and three at the back of the plane for varying periods of time. Meanwhile, in the first class cabin, just a foot or so from the cockpit door, the man with the dark suit - still wearing sunglasses - was also standing. Not one of the flight crew members suggested that any of these men take their seats.

Watching all of this, my husband was now beyond anxious. I decided to try to reassure my husband (and maybe myself) by walking to the back bathroom. I knew the goateed-man I had exchanged friendly words with as we boarded the plane was seated only a few rows back, so I thought I would say hello to the man to get some reassurance that everything was fine. As I stood up and turned around, I glanced in his direction and we made eye contact. I threw out my friendliest remember-me-we-had-a-nice-exchange-just-a-short-time-ago smile. The man did not smile back. His face did not move. In fact, the cold, defiant look he gave me sent shivers down my spine.

When I returned to my seat I was unable to assure my husband that all was well. My husband immediately walked to the first class section to talk with the flight attendant. I might be overreacting, but I've been watching some really suspicious things... Before he could finish his statement, the flight attendant pulled him into the galley. In a quiet voice she explained that they were all concerned about what was going on. The captain was aware. The flight attendants were passing notes to each other. She said that there were people on board higher up than you and me watching the men. My husband returned to his seat and relayed this information to me. He was feeling slightly better. I was feeling much worse. We were now two hours into a four-in-a-half hour flight.

Approximately 10 minutes later, that same flight attendant came by with the drinks cart. She leaned over and quietly told my husband there were federal air marshals sitting all around us. She asked him not to tell anyone and explained that she could be in trouble for giving out that information. She then continued serving drinks.

About 20 minutes later the same flight attendant returned. Leaning over and whispering, she asked my husband to write a description of the yellow-shirted man sitting across from us. She explained it would look too suspicious if she wrote the information. She asked my husband to slip the note to her when he was done.

After seeing 14 Middle Eastern men board separately (six together, eight individually) and then act as a group, watching their unusual glances, observing their bizarre bathroom activities, watching them congregate in small groups, knowing that the flight attendants and the pilots were seriously concerned, and now knowing that federal air marshals were on board, I was officially terrified.. Before I'm labeled a racial profiler or -- worse yet -- a racist, let me add this. A month ago I traveled to India to research a magazine article I was writing. My husband and I flew on a jumbo jet carrying more than 300 Hindu and Muslim men and women on board. We traveled throughout the country and stayed in a Muslim village 10 miles outside Pakistan. I never once felt fearful. I never once felt unsafe. I never once had the feeling that anyone wanted to hurt me. This time was different.

Finally, the captain announced that the plane was cleared for landing. It had been four hours since we left Detroit. The fasten seat belt light came on and I could see downtown Los Angeles. The flight attendants made one final sweep of the cabin and strapped themselves in for landing. I began to relax. Home was in sight.

continued.........

thedrifter
07-15-04, 06:37 PM
Suddenly, seven of the men stood up -- in unison -- and walked to the front and back lavatories. One by one, they went into the two lavatories, each spending about four minutes inside. Right in front...

thedrifter
07-15-04, 06:39 PM
The U.S. Transportation and Security Administration has issued a new directive which demands pilots make a pre-flight announcement banning passengers from congregating in aisles and outside the plane's toilets. The directive also orders flight attendants to check the toilets every two hours for suspicious packages.

Through a series of events, The Washington Post heard about my story. I talked briefly about my experience with a representative from the newspaper. Within a few hours I received a call from Dave Adams, the Federal Air Marshal Services (FAM) Head of Public Affairs. Adams told me what he knew:

There were 14 Syrians on NWA flight #327. They were questioned at length by FAM, the FBI and the TSA upon landing in Los Angeles. The 14 Syrians had been hired as musicians to play at a casino in the desert. Adams said they were scrubbed. None had arrest records (in America, I presume), none showed up on the FBI's no fly list or the FBI's Most Wanted Terrorists List. The men checked out and they were let go. According to Adams, the 14 men traveled on Northwest Airlines flight #327 using one-way tickets. Two days later they were scheduled to fly back on jetBlue from Long Beach, California to New York -- also using one-way tickets.

I asked Adams why, based on the FBI's credible information that terrorists may try to assemble bombs on planes, the air marshals or the flight attendants didn't do anything about the bizarre behavior and frequent trips to the lavatory. Our FAM agents have to have an event to arrest somebody. Our agents aren't going to deploy until there is an actual event, Adams explained. He said he could not speak for the policies of Northwest Airlines.

So the question is... Do I think these men were musicians? I'll let you decide. But I wonder, if 19 terrorists can learn to fly airplanes into buildings, couldn't 14 terrorists learn to play instruments?

http://www.womenswallstreet.com/WWS/article_landing.aspx?titleid=1&articleid=711


Ellie

Sgted
07-15-04, 07:31 PM
Incredible........
And chilling.

HardJedi
07-15-04, 07:35 PM
I agree...... chilling. thats the exact word I was looking for

Sparrowhawk
07-15-04, 08:59 PM
we may see this action re-enacted in the sky but with real stuff next time.

Osotogary
07-15-04, 09:14 PM
Whatever happened to the promise of Air Marshalls? 3 seats, front, back and center, half diamond configuration.

HardJedi
07-15-04, 09:18 PM
well, they never hired enough of em, at least, that's what I HEARD.

GunnyL
07-15-04, 10:17 PM
This country needs to wake up! There's nothing wrong with Target Profiling if it saves American lives. The Liberals in this country are too busy trying to make everybody feel good instead of worying about what's good for society as a whole.

HardJedi
07-15-04, 10:46 PM
Hey Gunny L I totall agree, I actually did a whole thred about that. about why profiling was good. lets see it I can find it for you.


there ya go! found it!

http://www.leatherneck.com/forums/showthread.php?s=&threadid=15469

mrbsox
07-16-04, 10:02 PM
I haven't had the chance to travel for a few months now, but used to get around about 2 to 3 weeks a month.

This is EXACTLY why I choose an aisle seat now. I have it set in my travel profile, right side, aisle seat.

Maybe the Feds, can't profile, but you can bet your sweet a$$ I CAN !!

Semper Fi :marine:

HardJedi
07-18-04, 05:03 PM
Originally posted by mrbsox

Maybe the Feds, can't profile, but you can bet your sweet a$$ I CAN !!

Semper Fi :marine:


you got THAT right!

thedrifter
07-31-04, 07:45 AM
Part III: Terror in the Skies, Again?

By Annie Jacobsen

A WWS Exclusive Article


It's been two-and-a-half weeks since the first "Terror in the Skies, Again?" article was posted on WomensWallStreet.com and subsequently set off an international debate. From the cockpit to the coffee shop, from the water coolers to the halls of Congress, countless numbers of people have been talking -- and shouting -- about this article. It seems that anyone who reads the article develops a strong opinion, which in turn creates more questions. Flight #327 has opened Pandora's box.

Last week, when the name of the band was revealed (Syrian singer Nour Mehana) one side shouted: See, we told you so! Then, when we learned that 13 of the 14 Syrian musicians were traveling on expired visas (which no one from the FBI, the TSA, the LAPD, or the JTTF noticed), the other side shouted: No, we told you so!

I watched the two sides rally back and forth all week until finally, to borrow columnist Michelle Malkin's words, Flight 327 Landed on Capitol Hill. And this is exactly where it should be. This week, I spoke at length with the United States House of Representatives Judiciary Committee on the matter. It was an honor and a privilege, and I believe things are finally in the right hands. It seems to me that the highest-ups don't like having to get information that involves national security from articles written by yours truly -- and I don't blame them. Thanks to all of you from both sides of the argument who have been so boisterous, the heart of the matter -- which is to investigate exactly what happened on flight #327, how it was handled or mishandled, and how to improve airline security in the future -- has gotten to members of Congress.

I've kept quiet about numerous matters that have surfaced over the past few weeks. But there is something I must share because I find it so telling. Yesterday, I had a conversation with Dr. Imad Moustapha, the United States Ambassador of Syria. Earlier in the week, Dr. Moustapha wrote this letter to the Editor of The Washington Times.

"I am responding to Audrey Hudson's article 'Scouting jetliners for new attacks' (Page 1, Thursday). We are shocked by this article. It only reflects paranoia verging on the point of hysterics. The woman mentioned most prominently in this article, Annie Jacobsen, is an advocate of ethnic profiling who survived a horrendous ordeal: a flight with 14 harmless Syrian musicians.

After this ordeal, and despite the fact that she reached her destination safe and sound, she 'spread 3,000 bigoted and paranoid words across the Internet,' as Salon.com put it.

"Your reporter failed to mention that the only 'crimes' these professional musicians were accused of committing were going to the lavatory, eating McDonald's food and talking to one another.

"The fact that they have performed in the past six months in places such as the Kennedy Center, the Lincoln Center and the Juilliard School did not prevent Mrs. Jacobsen from saying, 'Couldn't 14 terrorists learn to play instruments?'

"The reporter for The Washington Times should have informed her readers that the whole story was a case of a group of talented musicians going to Los Angeles to play music, as simple as that."

IMAD MOUSTAPHA
Ambassador of Syria


I called Dr. Moustapha to ask him if he had some kind of specific information about the "harmless" men on my flight. Perhaps, he, of all people, could clear some things up. What an opportunity! I thought. I've always maintained that if these 14 Syrians showed up on my doorstep and serenaded me, I'd still have some serious questions about their behavior at 30,000 feet. Remember, they themselves admitted to law enforcement in Los Angeles that they "acted suspiciously."

Maybe Dr. Moustapha -- of all people in the United States -- with his long list of credentials and his diplomatic pull, might actually be able to get me in touch with these 14 members of Nour Mehana's back-up band. Maybe he could help put the lid back on Pandora's box.

I mean, could it all really be as simple as reporter Joe Sharkey from The New York Times says it is -- that these Syrian individuals simply confused how to act on a 757 jet in America with how one might act on a bus in Damascus? The same way that someone from the North Pole might think it's OK to wear a ski mask into an American bank? Certainly Dr. Moustapha, a member of the Syrian team responsible for drafting reform strategies for the ministries of Culture, Education, and Higher Education, might be able to account for the behavior that I, other passengers, the flight crew and the federal air marshals found so disturbing.

After introductory pleasantries, I asked Dr. Moustapha why his letter suggested that these 14 Syrians played at the Lincoln Center, the Kennedy Center, and the Julliard School, when according to my research, that's not at all the case.

Dr. Moustapha said Nour Mehana and his back-up band had not played there, but that other Syrian musicians had. I told Dr. Moustapha that his letter to The Washington Times was at best misleading, and at worst, completely misrepresenting the facts. I added that I didn't consider doing so either diplomatic or fair.

Dr. Moustapha told me that I was a paranoid racist.

I asked Dr. Moustapha if, by suggesting that all Syrian musicians are innocent (not to mention talented) just because they are Syrian, wasn't that the same kind of gross generalization he'd accused me of?

Dr. Moustapha told me again that I was a paranoid person and that the men did nothing wrong.

I reminded him that it was the in-flight behavior of the men (which has now been corroborated by other passengers) which caused alarm, not their Syrian heritage. (To read email from two other individuals with information about flight #327, click here.)

He said a few more things that aren't fit to print.

I suggested to Dr. Moustapha that we focus on a diplomatic solution, that perhaps he himself could help to locate the 14 Syrian musicians in question so that they could share their side of the story. I waited for an answer, but instead, Dr. Moustapha hung up on me.

Sounds like Dr. Moustapha won't be helping us find the band. Sounds like this matter is going to be left up to The Hill.

http://www.womenswallstreet.com/WWS/article_landing.aspx?articleid=726&Titleid=1&titlename=&start=5636


Ellie

thedrifter
08-12-04, 04:10 PM
Another Passenger from Flight 327 Steps Forward With Disturbing New Details

By Annie Jacobsen

This is Part V of the ongoing series entitled “Terror in the Skies, Again?”


A few days ago, WomensWallStreet.com received an important email. It was from Billie Jo Rodriguez, another passenger who was on Northwest Airlines flight 327 from Detroit to Los Angeles on June 29. Billie Jo is a Certified Public Accountant living in Oxnard, California. She had some additional, disturbing information about flight 327 that she felt someone needed to know. She had been so terrified by what happened on the flight that she sent two emails to the Department of Homeland Security telling them about the experience, but she hadn't heard back from them. Then, through a series of events, she heard about my article, "Terror in the Skies, Again?" She and I have had numerous conversations and she is willing to share her story on the record. The following interview is based on conversations Billie Jo and I have had, as well as a discussion she had with my editor.

ANNIE: Where were you sitting on flight 327?
BILLIE JO: I was in seat 21-C. Three of the Middle Eastern men were sitting right near me --- the man in the jogging suit [with Arabic writing] was in the aisle seat right behind me (22C), another man from the group sat right next to me (21-B) and another man from the group sat one row in front of me (20-E).

ANNIE: Tell me what the men were doing that was out of the ordinary?
BILLIE JO: It was when we were up in the air and they started walking up and down the aisles. And the eye contact. The thing that really got me was the eye contact. It was so subtle. If you know somebody, you look at them. You nod your head. That's not what these guys were doing. They were doing these little looks and head signals -- acknowledging each other and yet pretending not to know each other.

Then the guy next to me was pretending to be sleeping. But when people sleep, you know, they breathe deeply. This guy was pretending to sleep. They were all doing this little eye thing, and this little head thing. A couple of the other guys were going up and down the aisles looking at each other, making those head signals. They were signaling to each other, that was really freaky.

ANNIE: Tell me what else you saw.
BILLIE JO: I noticed the McDonald's bag right away. It was so big and I thought, how many burgers does he have in there? It was weird. And I noticed the man with the limp -- it was more than a limp. It was a dragging of the foot.

I also have to tell you one detail that you didn't catch. I emailed this detail to the Department of Homeland Security but I haven't heard back. As I mentioned, the tall man in the jogging suit sat right behind me. He got up and passed by me to go to the bathroom up in first class. (Note to readers: This is the same man that, according to a first class passenger, pushed another passenger out of the way to get into the lavatory first. This is also the man mentioned in a TIME magazine article who spent 10 minutes in the bathroom, which alarmed a Federal Air Marshal who then searched the lavatory).

The man was gone for a very long time. And when he came back, he reeked of chemicals -- the chemicals from the toilet bowl. He absolutely reeked of it. And I thought, what was he doing in the toilet? He didn't smell like chemicals when he got up to go to the bathroom -- it was when he came back. It was so spooky. What was he doing in there? That he would smell so strong of chemicals from the toilet?

ANNIE: What were the men doing as the plane was landing?
BILLIE JO: When we were finally landing, I hear this flight attendant say, "Sir, stay in you seat." She was strapped into her seat -- it was on the microphone. She said again, "Sir, stay in your seat," and again, "Sir, stay in your seat!"

ANNIE: And did the man sit down?
BILLIE JO: I was afraid to look around. Quite frankly, I thought to myself, 'Well, this is it.' At this point, I was doing some praying. I know it sounds chicken, but that's what I was doing.

ANNIE: In a recent TIME magazine article, one of the Air Marshals on flight 327 is quoted as saying, "There was never a threat on the plane." Tell me how you'd respond to this.
BILLIE JO: I did NOT feel safe on that plane. I felt there was a definite threat. That's why I was so nervous. As I said earlier, I thought 'Billie Jo, this is it.'

ANNIE: What did you notice once the plane landed?
BILLIE JO: When we pulled up to the gate and I got off the plane, I thought, why are we at the first gate? Since I didn't think Northwest had a hub in Los Angeles, I didn't think we'd get the first gate. Now I think I understand. I think they took us to the first gate to make it easier for the officials to get to the plane, but I don't know for sure. When I first got off the plane, I said, Thank you God.

ANNIE: What did you do once you got home?
BILLIE JO: I told everyone I know about the flight. I also went to the FBI website to try to file a report with them. The FBI's site requires you to submit your name and contact information, and I got cold feet. But then I went to the Department of Homeland Security's website, and like I said, I emailed them the information about the man smelling like chemicals.

ANNIE: Any thoughts about some of the things you've read about flight 327?
BILLIE JO: I was really surprised to learn there were Air Marshals on board because while I was on that flight, I did not at all feel protected. There was one passenger, a silver-haired man, standing there by the [coach class] galley a lot. He was watching the whole situation and I thought, good, he knows what's going on. And I thought to myself that he seems to be the only one who will do something if and when something happens. (Note to readers: This man was a coach class passenger. His wife wrote to us.

I was also not happy to hear that no one bothered to check the visas. Not after 9/11. Before 9/11, we lived in an almost Shangri-La. After 9/11, it should be different. Why am I taking my shoes off if they're not checking visas?

ANNIE: Do you have any questions about how flight 327 has been handled?
BILLIE JO: Yes. Why hasn't anyone gotten the flight manifest? It's too bad you couldn't look at the manifest, or get someone from the government to look at the manifest, to talk to or contact the other passengers. Because many other people noticed something was happening. I exchanged looks with other passengers. Every single person around me noticed something was awry. How could you not notice? The flight attendants seemed to be paying no attention. One of them occasionally turned around and looked back at the cabin at what was going on. But the other one, well, unless she's a great actress, she had no idea. She was flitting around the cabin like nothing was happening.

ANNIE: Thanks for coming forward.
BILLIE JO: I'm glad I contacted you. It was too scary and too serious just to let go.

Update from Annie
Billie Jo is right. What happened on flight 327 -- and how it has subsequently been mishandled --- is too scary and too serious to just let go. I don't have answers to all of Billie Jo's questions, but I can answer one.

A few days ago, I put a call in to Dave Adams, the Federal Air Marshal Services (FAM) Head of Public Affairs. Some of you may remember that Adams and I spoke on July 9, several days before my first article was published. He and I did not speak again until a few days ago, on August 9 and August 10, when we had two rather heated phone conversations. During one of them, I asked Adams the question that Billie Jo Rodriguez had asked me: "Exactly how many other passengers on flight 327 have the FAM and/or the FBI been in contact with during the past month?"

Adams said that they had interviewed the Air Marshals on my flight as well as all the flight attendants from flight 327 -- several times.

I told Adams that wasn't my question. I specifically wanted to know how many other passengers the FAM and/or the FBI had been in contact with during the past month.

Adams said my husband and I were the only two to come forward.

I told him that wasn't true, that I now had the corroborative accounts of seven passengers in addition to my husband and myself.

continued..........

thedrifter
08-12-04, 04:11 PM
He repeated that no one else had been in touch with him.

I reminded Adams that as law enforcement, he had access to the flight manifest. Then I repeated Billie Jo's question, "How many passengers from flight 327 have you contacted?"

Adams said zero.

I asked him why.

Adams said that the Air Marshals on flight 327 had determined that there was in fact "suspicious activity" on board flight 327 but that they determined it wasn't a "threat." That was it -- I was splitting hairs.

I asked Adams how the Air Marshals on my flight could have seen what was going on in coach class when they were sitting in first class. I explained that it would be impossible for any of the Air Marshals to have seen what we saw in coach, and that his Air Marshal misrepresented the truth to TIME magazine. (Click here to see the Boeing B757/756 seat map.) (Click here to read the TIME magazine article.)

Adams told me the Air Marshal stood up and made an assessment of things in coach. (According to TIME magazine, the Air Marshal said "he watched the men and saw nothing out of the ordinary.") I explained to Adams that I remember that Air Marshal's assessment of the men's activities because I saw it happen. I saw one of the Air Marshals stand by the galley and look back into the coach class cabin for approximately 2.5 minutes. That was it. I even told Adams the color of the Air Marshal's shirt, his skin tone and his waist size. Adams didn't respond.

And then, in the midst of arguing with Adams, I had an epiphany. I realized that Dave Adams is not the guy I should be focusing on. He's not the person I need to hear from. Adams' main concern is that the Air Marshals he represents are cleared of any wrong doing. All the information Adams has is second hand. He wasn't on the flight and he wasn't at the airport when the flight landed. Adams, I realized, is just a guy in an office somewhere in Virginia, whose job requires him to push forth a whole host of second-hand party lines.

It dawned on me that I need to hear from the FBI. So I asked Adams why the FBI has been silent about flight 327.

He said the FBI considered flight 327 an ongoing investigation.

I visited the FBI's website. While I knew that the FBI's number one priority (of its top ten) is protecting the U.S. from terrorist attacks, I didn't know specifically that "the prevention of terrorism takes precedence in our thinking and planning; in our hiring and staffing; in our training and technologies; and, most importantly, in our investigations."

Clearly, it's time for me to write a letter to Robert Mueller, Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation.

http://www.womenswallstreet.com/WWS/article_landing.aspx?articleid=733&Titleid=1&titlename=&start=8616


Ellie