PDA

View Full Version : Missile defense damns Obama 'flexibility'



irpat54
06-01-17, 04:26 PM
By Daniel John Sobieski
31516

Tuesday's missile defense test, in which a ground-based interceptor successfully intercepted an ICBM over the Pacific, was both a warning to North Korea and another indication that America is back. The test was in the works before Trump took office, but it comes on an administration welcoming improvements in missile defense versus the prior Obama administration that used back channels to give it away to Putin and the Russians.

As the Washington Examiner reported:

The U.S. Missile Defense Agency successfully shot down a dummy warhead in space over the Pacific Ocean Tuesday during a test of a missile defense system that would protect the country from intercontinental ballistic missiles like the ones being developed by North Korea.

"During the test, an ICBM-class target was launched from the Reagan Test Site on Kwajalein Atoll in the Republic of the Marshall Islands," said a statement from the agency. "A ground-based interceptor was launched from Vandenberg Air Force Base, California, and its exo-atmospheric kill vehicle intercepted and destroyed the target in a direct collision."

The irony of the interceptor being launched from a facility with Ronald Reagan's name on it should escape no one. President Reagan dreamed of a multi-layered missile defense most derided as "Star Wars." He dreamed of preventing or deterring a nuclear attack, not merely avenging one. Perhaps he might have also had in mind the danger posed from rogue regimes such as North Korea and Iran.

We see Reagan's legacy in the Aegis missile cruisers and destroyers that can be deployed in troubled waters around the globe. We see it in the THAAD theater missile defense recently deployed to South Korea. All of this President Barack Hussein Obama opposed.

Missile defense systems are systems President Obama has long opposed as "Cold War" weapons. When President Obama took office in January 2009, sitting on his desk were President George W. Bush's plans for the deployment of ground-based missile interceptors, such as are deployed at Fort Greely, Alaska, in Poland, as well as missile defense radars in the Czech Republic.

As Investor's Business Daily noted over a year ago, President Obama had other plans. His betrayal of our allies was ironically exquisite:

Yet within hours of Medvedev's election as president in 2008, the Russian announced that Moscow would deploy SS-26 missiles in his country's enclave of Kaliningrad situated between our NATO allies Poland and Lithuania.

He wanted the U.S. to abandon plans to deploy missile interceptors in Poland and warning radars in the Czech Republic designed to counter a future threat from Iran.

What did President Obama do? He caved in and notified the Poles in a midnight phone call on Sept. 17, 2009 the 70th anniversary of the Soviet Union's invasion of Poland that we were pulling the plug on that system due to Russian objections.

Putin then watched in 2012 as Obama promised Medvedev at the Nuclear Security Summit in Seoul, South Korea, that after his re-election he would have more "flexibility" to weaken missile defense, which would help him fulfill his dream of U.S. disarmament.

Putin know full well Obama's weakness in responding to any foreign threat to U.S. interests and security. President Obama was our Neville Chamberlain, promising "peace in our time" as he invited war with weakness, apologies, and appeasement. It was he who colluded with the Russians to threaten American national security in the "back channel" conversation with Medvedev that fell victim to an open mic.

Thanks largely to President George W. Bush and his push to fulfill President Ronald Reagan's dream, the continental United States and overseas allies are protected against missile attack by 30 deployed long-range ground-based interceptors (GBI), 32 Navy ships armed with over 100 SM-3 IA interceptors and two dozen advanced SM-3 IB interceptors, dozens of Terminal High-Altitude Area Defense (THAAD) interceptors, and eight X-band missile defense radars deployed abroad.

It was Obama who proved to be Russia's and Putin's lapdog. Trump may have the chance to fire a second shot heard around the world, securing America's freedom and very existence. When that pudgy little man-child gets his latest toy, just shoot that North Korean ICBM test down.

Kurt Loadeater
06-04-17, 07:16 PM
Honestly, aren't you tired of talking about Obama at this point? I swear to god some folks are just addicted to hating him. You can let go now.

Kurt Loadeater
06-04-17, 07:32 PM
Well you put obama right in the subject line, for emphasis? Anyway, because I do not go out constantly seeking information or articles about him, I've had a pretty easy time ignoring his existence.

irpat54
06-04-17, 07:39 PM
Well you put obama right in the subject line, for emphasis? Anyway, because I do not go out constantly seeking information or articles about him, I've had a pretty easy time ignoring his existence.

well now
1) I did not put it in the title line, the article came that way
2) it was more for the fact that I love this stuff of missile defense systems and
3) Obama has his ugly mug all over CNN, MSNBC and the rest of the ISIS loving networks..

when he fads into absurdity and obscurity, then I forget about him, but honestly he will probably be in jail soon anyway, what with the raid on whats her name Huma Abedin's house here in dearborn.. it is getting close to Hillary and Obama, the crap they pulled

Kurt Loadeater
06-08-17, 03:19 PM
I have neither the time nor the inclination to explain myself to a man who rises and sleeps under the blanket of the very freedom that we provide and then questions the manner in which we provide it.

I would rather that you just said "thank you" and went on your way. Otherwise, I suggest you pick up a weapon and stand a post.

advanced
06-08-17, 04:19 PM
I have neither the time nor the inclination to explain myself to a man who rises and sleeps under the blanket of the very freedom that we provide and then questions the manner in which we provide it.

I would rather that you just said "thank you" and went on your way. Otherwise, I suggest you pick up a weapon and stand a post.
Just for kicks, explain to us just who the WE above references.

irpat54
06-08-17, 04:37 PM
I have neither the time nor the inclination to explain myself to a man who rises and sleeps under the blanket of the very freedom that we provide and then questions the manner in which we provide it.

I would rather that you just said "thank you" and went on your way. Otherwise, I suggest you pick up a weapon and stand a post.

Please enlighten me on what this has to do with any of the posts or the article.